Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,393 posts)
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 05:00 PM Mar 2015

Controversial guardrail performs correctly in federally mandated tests

Last edited Mon Mar 16, 2015, 09:16 AM - Edit history (1)

If this subject sounds familiar, maybe it's because of this:

Feds Open Website for Public Reporting of Guardrail Flaws

and this:

Federal jury sides with whistle-blower against Dallas-based Trinity Industries; damages over $800M

There was an article about this on ABC 2020 newsmagazine TV show Saturday night, March 14:

2020 3/14/15: Fatigued Truckers and the Deadly Consequences

They had another article earlier in March:

Senators Want Investigation Into Federal Agency Overseeing Guardrail Safety

and this in February (warning: autoplay video):

Canadian City Sues US Guardrail Maker For $500 Million

Controversial guardrail performs correctly in federally mandated tests

Transportation
By Ashley Halsey III March 13
@ashleyhalsey3rd

A controversial guardrail cap that was alleged to spear vehicles that struck it has performed correctly in the final tests sought by the Federal Highway Administration.

The announcement Friday by the Transportation Department may clear the way for states to abandon plans for replacing an estimated 200,000 ET-Plus guardrail caps made by Trinity Industries, the largest manufacturer of the item.

Trinity has been engaged in a bitter legal battle with competitors who contend that modifications to the original Trinity cap caused deadly malfunctions. .... One competitor, Virginia guardrail engineer Joshua Harman, brought a federal whistleblower suit contending that Trinity failed to notify the FHWA when it changed the width of a key piece of metal from five inches to four inches. He says that the modification resulted in deadly malfunctions.
....

As the legal imbroglio unfolded in a welter of suits and countersuits, the FHWA ordered testing of the ET-Plus attached to guardrails of two different heights, 27 3/4 inches and 31?inches. ... The FHWA said last month that the tests at the lower height found that the ET-Plus performed correctly. A report on the second round of tests, released by the FHWA on Friday, found that it functioned properly at the 31-inch height as well.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Controversial guardrail performs correctly in federally mandated tests (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2015 OP
In real life, not so much ... GeorgeGist Mar 2015 #1
I thought that area looked familiar. mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2015 #2

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,393 posts)
2. I thought that area looked familiar.
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 09:31 AM
Mar 2015

I've driven that stretch of road. The pictures came from here: " target="_blank">Snopes: Standing Guardrail

I'll have to see who made that guardrail. The Montana DOT probably can come up with the answer.

The story is here too:

Shish-Ka-Burban: Guardrail Skewers SUV

And here: The endcap on a highway guard rail

which links to this:

The Suburban! - WOW!

Worse? Sure:

BMW Driver Somehow Survived This Guardrail Impaling Without A Scratch

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Controversial guardrail p...