Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
Tue Aug 23, 2016, 04:30 PM Aug 2016

California Supreme Court won't hear case attacking teachers

http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/8/22/1562799/-California-Supreme-Court-won-t-hear-case-attacking-teachers



The California Supreme Court refused Monday to hear a suit against the state’s teacher tenure laws, leaving the laws in place after a long-running legal battle. The lawsuit’s wealthy backers say they’ll take their efforts to the legislature next, trying to pass a law denying teachers due process.

The Vergara plaintiffs claimed that teacher tenure protects bad teachers, disproportionately harming poor and minority students. This argument convinced a Los Angeles Superior Court judge, but was overturned by an appeals court—and no wonder, since none of the named plaintiffs had one of the “grossly ineffective” teachers supposedly protected by tenure, and several of the plaintiffs attended schools that don’t have teacher tenure to begin with. Not to mention that one of the terrible awful teachers cited in the lawsuit had been Pasadena teacher of the year. “As the expert evidence clearly showed—and the Court of Appeal carefully reasoned,” said American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten in a statement, “it was the discretionary decisions of some administrators, rather than the statutes themselves, that contributed to the problems cited by the plaintiffs.”

<snip>

What’s more, in stark contrast to all the claims that tenure laws make teachers radically less likely to be fired, the author of a recent study on the effects of teachers unions says that:

By demanding higher salaries for teachers, unions give school districts a strong incentive to dismiss ineffective teachers before they get tenure. Highly unionized districts dismiss more bad teachers because it costs more to keep them. Using three different kinds of survey data from the National Center for Education Statistics, I confirmed that unionized districts dismiss more low-quality teachers than those with weak unions or no unions.



edit, background to the case: http://www.democraticunderground.com/11248517
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California Supreme Court won't hear case attacking teachers (Original Post) Starry Messenger Aug 2016 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author MichiganVote Aug 2016 #1
We have a sizable teacher shortage here too. Starry Messenger Aug 2016 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author MichiganVote Aug 2016 #3

Response to Starry Messenger (Original post)

Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #2)

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»California Supreme Court ...