Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumTalen pulls plug on nuclear plant
Talen pulls plug on nuclear plant
Anthony Salamone
ALLENTOWN Talen Energy Corp. has taken its final step to cancel a second nuclear power plant in Luzerne County that was first proposed nearly a decade ago.
The Allentown company said Wednesday it sent a written request to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission saying it sees no "viable path" to obtaining and operating license for its proposed Bell Bend nuclear power plant.
...
Talen Energy, which in early August reported a net loss of $3 million for the second quarter, said its shortfall included an impairment charge of $122 million related to the Bell Bend project. Company officials said then they had no plans to resume licensing and permitting activities for the project, according to Martin.
http://www.mcall.com/business/mc-talen-energy-withdraws-nuclear-plant-application-20160831-story.html
Anthony Salamone
ALLENTOWN Talen Energy Corp. has taken its final step to cancel a second nuclear power plant in Luzerne County that was first proposed nearly a decade ago.
The Allentown company said Wednesday it sent a written request to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission saying it sees no "viable path" to obtaining and operating license for its proposed Bell Bend nuclear power plant.
...
Talen Energy, which in early August reported a net loss of $3 million for the second quarter, said its shortfall included an impairment charge of $122 million related to the Bell Bend project. Company officials said then they had no plans to resume licensing and permitting activities for the project, according to Martin.
And my vote for the most outrageous corporate claim of the day comes from the same article:
Martin estimated Talen Energy had spent more than $200 million on the project. He said the costs were not borne by utility ratepayers.
He said the costs were not borne by utility ratepayers.
He said the costs were not borne by utility ratepayers.
SMH
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 824 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Talen pulls plug on nuclear plant (Original Post)
kristopher
Sep 2016
OP
FBaggins
(26,727 posts)1. Hardly a surprise since the EPR design certification was pulled a year and a half ago
SMH
Did they have a PUC approve higher rates that consumers had to pay? Nope - they took a loss that is paid by shareholders. Most of PA (unless the municipality is the power company) gives consumers the ability to shop the generation of their electricity... so there wouldn't be room to jack up rates to pre-fund construction - it would just cost them customers.
So shaking your head accomplishes nothing more than making yourself dizzy.
Did they have a PUC approve higher rates that consumers had to pay? Nope - they took a loss that is paid by shareholders. Most of PA (unless the municipality is the power company) gives consumers the ability to shop the generation of their electricity... so there wouldn't be room to jack up rates to pre-fund construction - it would just cost them customers.
So shaking your head accomplishes nothing more than making yourself dizzy.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)2. What other source of funds do they have besides ratepayers?
FBaggins
(26,727 posts)3. Their shareholders of course
aka - their profits. Which is what happened in this case.