Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,307 posts)
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 04:10 PM Sep 2016

Retrofitting Montana power plant would be costly, Department of Energy says

Retrofitting Montana power plant would be costly, Department of Energy says

MATTHEW BROWN Associated Press
Aug 31, 2016

Retrofitting Montana's largest coal-fired power plant to reduce greenhouse gas emissions would cost at least $1.2 billion, but that price tag could be at least partially offset by selling captured carbon dioxide for use in oil fields, federal officials said Wednesday. ... Senior U.S. Department of Energy representatives presented the agency's analysis of reducing emissions from the Colstrip plant at the request of Gov. Steve Bullock.

Colstrip is the state's main human-caused source of carbon dioxide pollution, a major contributor to climate change.
....

The plant in 2014 emitted about 16.5 million tons of carbon dioxide — two-thirds of the state's reported total, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.

Two of Colstrip's four electricity-generating units will close by 2022 under a legal settlement reached last month between the plant's owners and environmentalists. ... Retrofits on the remaining two units would reduce emissions between 30 percent and 47 percent, at a cost of $1.2 billion to $1.4 billion, said Angelos Kokkinos, the Energy Department's director of advanced energy systems.
....

Gazette reporters Holly Michels and Tom Lutey contributed to this report.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Retrofitting Montana power plant would be costly, Department of Energy says (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2016 OP
Too bad! 2naSalit Sep 2016 #1
I suppose there is plenty of wind in Montana nt msongs Sep 2016 #2
$1.2 Billion would be a drop in the proverbial bucket to Duppers Sep 2016 #3

Duppers

(28,117 posts)
3. $1.2 Billion would be a drop in the proverbial bucket to
Fri Sep 2, 2016, 11:42 AM
Sep 2016

the Defense Dept. who just spent $13 billion for the US Navy's new aircraft carrier.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Retrofitting Montana powe...