Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(19,937 posts)
Fri Apr 7, 2017, 08:25 AM Apr 2017

The carbon-wealth link

https://www.bc.edu/bc-web/bcnews/nation-world-society/sociology/schor-jorgenson-carbon-emissions-study.html
[font face=Serif]Friday, April 7, 2017

[font size=5]The carbon-wealth link[/font]

[font size=3]Across the U.S., state-level carbon emissions are higher in states where income is more highly concentrated among the wealthiest residents, according to a new study by two Boston College researchers.

On a global level, the connection between national wealth and carbon emissions has been well documented. The study, by sociologists Andrew Jorgenson and Juliet Schor, is the first to link income inequality and carbon emissions within and across the individual states.

The study found that state-level emissions between 1997 and 2012 were positively associated with the income share of the top 10 percent of a state’s population, according to the findings, published online by the journal Ecological Economics.

Using the 2012 state data for carbon emissions, and based on the statistical analysis reported in the research article, a one percent increase in the income share of the top 10 percent of a state’s population resulted in additional annual carbon emissions, led by:
  1. Texas – 812,325 to 934,174 metric tons
  2. California – 437,035 to 502,590 metric tons
  3. Pennsylvania – 284,980 to 327.728 metric tons
  4. Florida – 269,030 to 309,395 metric tons
  5. Illinois – 261,170 to 300,966 metric tons
  6. Ohio – 260,622 to 299,716 metric tons
  7. Louisiana – 246,618 to 283,611 metric tons
  8. Indiana – 232,886 to 237,819 metric tons
  9. New York – 196,234 to 225,670 metric tons
  10. Michigan – 184,835 to 212,560 metric tons
…[/font][/font]
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.016
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The carbon-wealth link