Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumClimate Change Misconceptions Common Among Teachers, Study Finds
http://munews.missouri.edu/news-releases/2017/0607-climate-change-misconceptions-common-among-teachers-study-finds/[font face=Serif][font size=5]Climate Change Misconceptions Common Among Teachers, Study Finds[/font]
June 07, 2017
Story Contact(s):
Nathan Hurst, hurstn@missouri.edu, 573-882-6217
[font size=3]COLUMBIA, Mo. Recent studies have shown that misconceptions about climate change and the scientific studies that have addressed climate change are pervasive among the U.S. public. Now, a new study by Benjamin Herman, assistant professor in the Department of Learning, Teaching and Curriculum in the University of Missouri College of Education, shows that many secondary school science teachers also possess several of these same misconceptions.
In the study, Herman surveyed 220 secondary science teachers in Florida and Puerto Rico to determine their knowledge about climate change science. The survey asked questions regarding things that do contribute to climate change, such as greenhouse gas emissions, and things that do not significantly contribute, such as the depletion of the ozone layer and the use of pesticides. The survey also asked whether controlled scientific experiments are required to validate climate change.
While the majority of the surveyed teachers accurately responded that fossil fuel use, automobiles and industry emissions were major causes of climate change, they also exhibited notable climate change misconceptions. For instance, nearly all of the Puerto Rico teachers and more than 70 percent of Florida teachers believed incorrectly that ozone layer depletion and pesticide use were at least minor, yet significant, causes of climate change. Additionally, Herman says that nearly 50 percent of Florida teachers and nearly 70 percent of Puerto Rico teachers think that climate change science must be studied through controlled experiments to be valid.
Herman says the teachers in his study exhibited climate change science misconceptions at a similar rate to average Americans. He says these results are understandable given that teachers are often overworked and not afforded professional development opportunities that would deepen their climate change science knowledge.
[/font][/font]
June 07, 2017
Story Contact(s):
Nathan Hurst, hurstn@missouri.edu, 573-882-6217
[font size=3]COLUMBIA, Mo. Recent studies have shown that misconceptions about climate change and the scientific studies that have addressed climate change are pervasive among the U.S. public. Now, a new study by Benjamin Herman, assistant professor in the Department of Learning, Teaching and Curriculum in the University of Missouri College of Education, shows that many secondary school science teachers also possess several of these same misconceptions.
In the study, Herman surveyed 220 secondary science teachers in Florida and Puerto Rico to determine their knowledge about climate change science. The survey asked questions regarding things that do contribute to climate change, such as greenhouse gas emissions, and things that do not significantly contribute, such as the depletion of the ozone layer and the use of pesticides. The survey also asked whether controlled scientific experiments are required to validate climate change.
While the majority of the surveyed teachers accurately responded that fossil fuel use, automobiles and industry emissions were major causes of climate change, they also exhibited notable climate change misconceptions. For instance, nearly all of the Puerto Rico teachers and more than 70 percent of Florida teachers believed incorrectly that ozone layer depletion and pesticide use were at least minor, yet significant, causes of climate change. Additionally, Herman says that nearly 50 percent of Florida teachers and nearly 70 percent of Puerto Rico teachers think that climate change science must be studied through controlled experiments to be valid.
Herman says the teachers in his study exhibited climate change science misconceptions at a similar rate to average Americans. He says these results are understandable given that teachers are often overworked and not afforded professional development opportunities that would deepen their climate change science knowledge.
[/font][/font]
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9706-6
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 3042 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Climate Change Misconceptions Common Among Teachers, Study Finds (Original Post)
OKIsItJustMe
Jun 2017
OP
dembotoz
(16,799 posts)1. Few years back wife wanted middle kid in a Lutheran School
Went to open house where the 4th graders had a display on how dinosaurs were a hoax. These findings do not surprise me
OKIsItJustMe
(19,938 posts)2. We're not talking about teachers in a "religious" school environment here
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9706-6
We distributed surveys to FL (N?=?102) and PR (N?=?118) secondary science teachers as part of a convenience sample at the Florida Association of Science Teachers Conference and at schools in FL and PR. Again, this study focused only on secondary science teachers who claimed to deeply teach climate change. Therefore, we retained only those surveys if the participating teachers indicated teaching about climate change as distinct lessons, a unit, or a unifying theme of a course (see section 4 as described above and in Appendix A of the electronic supplementary materials). We then individually reviewed and removed surveys if they were clearly satisficed (e.g. incomplete or exhibited straight-lined Likert responses) (Krosnick, 1991). Thus, of the original 220 teachers surveyed, 56 FL and 60 PR teachers surveys were retained for analysis.
We distributed surveys to FL (N?=?102) and PR (N?=?118) secondary science teachers as part of a convenience sample at the Florida Association of Science Teachers Conference and at schools in FL and PR. Again, this study focused only on secondary science teachers who claimed to deeply teach climate change. Therefore, we retained only those surveys if the participating teachers indicated teaching about climate change as distinct lessons, a unit, or a unifying theme of a course (see section 4 as described above and in Appendix A of the electronic supplementary materials). We then individually reviewed and removed surveys if they were clearly satisficed (e.g. incomplete or exhibited straight-lined Likert responses) (Krosnick, 1991). Thus, of the original 220 teachers surveyed, 56 FL and 60 PR teachers surveys were retained for analysis.