HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Environment & Energy » Environment & Energy (Group) » Chevron says Dutch Suprem...

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 05:08 AM

Chevron says Dutch Supreme Court rejects Ecuador's $9.5 billion claim

Source: Reuters

BUSINESS NEWS APRIL 16, 2019 / 1:44 AM / UPDATED 4 HOURS AGO

Chevron says Dutch Supreme Court rejects Ecuador's $9.5 billion claim

(Reuters) - The Supreme Court of the Netherlands dismissed Ecuador’s attempts to annul decisions of an international arbitral tribunal that ordered Ecuador to prevent enforcement of a $9.5 billion judgment against Chevron Corp anywhere in the world, the U.S. oil major said on Tuesday.

Chevron said the Dutch court’s decision upholds rulings of two Dutch lower courts which rejected Ecuador’s attempts to annul those awards.

“The Dutch supreme court found that the challenged arbitral awards are consistent with public policy and justified to prevent irreversible harm to Chevron,” the company said.

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court of Canada had dismissed claims attempting to force Chevron’s Canadian unit to pay the $9.5 billion judgment handed down in Ecuador against the company over pollution in the Andean country.

Residents of Ecuador’s Lago Agrio region have been trying to force Chevron to pay for water and soil contamination caused from 1964 to 1992 by Texaco, which Chevron acquired in 2001.

-snip-

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-chevron-netherlands-ecuador/chevron-says-dutch-supreme-court-rejects-ecuadors-9-5-billion-claim-idUSKCN1RS0DE

1 replies, 341 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 1 replies Author Time Post
Reply Chevron says Dutch Supreme Court rejects Ecuador's $9.5 billion claim (Original post)
Eugene Apr 2019 OP
Kurt V. Apr 2019 #1

Response to Eugene (Original post)

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 05:20 AM

1. Irreversible harm to chevron is more important than irreversible harm to the andeans.

so it goes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread