Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumCoal Industry Pays Fake Activists $50 To Wear Pro-Coal Shirts At Public Hearing
Coal Industry Pays Fake Activists $50 To Wear Pro-Coal Shirts At Public Hearing
By Rebecca Leber on May 25, 2012 at 11:38 am
"Activists" offered $50 to wear pro-coal shirts.
Apparently unable to find real activists, the coal industry paid astroturfers $50 to wear pro-coal t-shirts at an Environmental Protection Agency hearing yesterday.
The EPA hearings, held yesterday in Chicago and Washington, D.C., were focused on the agencys first-ever carbon standards for new power plants. The industry has adamantly opposed these standards, as well as standards on mercury a pollutant that even Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) admits is harmful.
This year, coal is throwing around its weight by spending tens of millions of dollars on media advertising and political contributions.
Coal is also engaging in fake advocacy campaigns, known as astroturfing. In a Craigslist ad found by the Environmental Law & Policy Center in Chicago, a coal group promised participants $50 to wear a t-shirt in support of an energy project. Upon further digging, the Sierra Club blog pieced together much of the deleted Craigslist ad:
...
By Rebecca Leber on May 25, 2012 at 11:38 am
"Activists" offered $50 to wear pro-coal shirts.
Apparently unable to find real activists, the coal industry paid astroturfers $50 to wear pro-coal t-shirts at an Environmental Protection Agency hearing yesterday.
The EPA hearings, held yesterday in Chicago and Washington, D.C., were focused on the agencys first-ever carbon standards for new power plants. The industry has adamantly opposed these standards, as well as standards on mercury a pollutant that even Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) admits is harmful.
This year, coal is throwing around its weight by spending tens of millions of dollars on media advertising and political contributions.
Coal is also engaging in fake advocacy campaigns, known as astroturfing. In a Craigslist ad found by the Environmental Law & Policy Center in Chicago, a coal group promised participants $50 to wear a t-shirt in support of an energy project. Upon further digging, the Sierra Club blog pieced together much of the deleted Craigslist ad:
People needed to attend a public meeting (Tinley Park /Chicago)
Reply to: px6mq-3031150602@gigs.craigslist.org (email address no longer valid)
Looking for people THIS THURSDAY, MAY 24 who want to make a couple of dollars for a few hours of your time.
All you need to do is wear a t-shirt in support of an energy project for two hours during the public meeting. We will be departing the Tinely Park convention center at 8:15 am for the meeting and we will be back by 1:30 pm. For your time we will pay you $50 cash and provide you lunch once we return to the convention center.
...
See screenshot of ad at: http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/05/25/490340/coal-astroturfing-epa-hearing/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 3250 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (18)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Coal Industry Pays Fake Activists $50 To Wear Pro-Coal Shirts At Public Hearing (Original Post)
kristopher
May 2012
OP
Because the American people don't know the difference between 'free speech' and 'paid for speech.'
freshwest
May 2012
#1
Good! The more coverage of what the coal/nuclear complex is up to, the better.
kristopher
May 2012
#6
freshwest
(53,661 posts)1. Because the American people don't know the difference between 'free speech' and 'paid for speech.'
kristopher
(29,798 posts)3. Well, if *I* don't have to pay for it, doesn't that make it free?
my header is the ballon I imagine over the head of the character in a cartoon wearing an Elephant button.
WriteWrong
(85 posts)4. What ELSE will these people do for $50?
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)5. Multiple prior threads in other groups/forums
kristopher
(29,798 posts)6. Good! The more coverage of what the coal/nuclear complex is up to, the better.
AllyCat
(16,145 posts)7. It's like the GOP paying WI residents to put pro-Walker signs in their yards
They can't find supporters, they have to pay them.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)8. that's a backhanded way of buying votes.