Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
Sat Jan 26, 2013, 10:29 AM Jan 2013

In North Dakota, Flames of Wasted Natural Gas Light the Prairie (175 milion cu ft/day)



"They are not wildfires caused by lightning strikes or other acts of nature, but the deliberate burning of natural gas by oil companies rushing to extract oil from the Bakken shale field and take advantage of the high price of crude. The gas bubbles up alongside the far more valuable oil, and with less economic incentive to capture it, the drillers treat the gas as waste and simply burn it.

Every day, more than 100 million cubic feet of natural gas is flared this way — enough energy to heat half a million homes for a day.

The flared gas also spews at least two million tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every year, as much as 384,000 cars or a medium-size coal-fired power plant would emit, alarming some environmentalists. "

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/27/business/energy-environment/in-north-dakota-wasted-natural-gas-flickers-against-the-sky.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

(Article from Sept 2011)
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In North Dakota, Flames of Wasted Natural Gas Light the Prairie (175 milion cu ft/day) (Original Post) wtmusic Jan 2013 OP
We get a new thread on this every day. Not inappropriate, I suppose. Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #1
Personally, I would support shutting the whole $&?#% thing down. wtmusic Jan 2013 #2
We need energy. I doubt your computer is running on solar power. Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #3
We need dirty energy like a hole in the head. wtmusic Jan 2013 #4
More likely your comp runs on coal. Maybe nuke with a slight chance of natural gas. Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #5
Mostly on coal, a third on natural gas. wtmusic Jan 2013 #7
+1000 Champion Jack Jan 2013 #6
disgustingly irresponsible in several different ways limpyhobbler Jan 2013 #8
 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
1. We get a new thread on this every day. Not inappropriate, I suppose.
Sat Jan 26, 2013, 10:38 AM
Jan 2013

Would we support the efforts in North Dakota if they captured and sold the natural gas?

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
2. Personally, I would support shutting the whole $&?#% thing down.
Sat Jan 26, 2013, 10:43 AM
Jan 2013

This is criminal, not only as waste but the atmospheric CO2 contribution when we can least afford it.

Contaminated groundwater, contaminated air. Shale gas, which Obama proudly proclaims America's energy savior, is a nightmare.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
3. We need energy. I doubt your computer is running on solar power.
Sat Jan 26, 2013, 10:46 AM
Jan 2013

Somebody needs to put those feet in North Dakota into the fire of the flares they are burning and force them to be more efficient.

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
4. We need dirty energy like a hole in the head.
Sat Jan 26, 2013, 11:03 AM
Jan 2013

Not to mention - this energy goes on the international market and makes nary a dent in our supply.

It's just something else to sell.

Onedit: fortunately my computer doesn't run on gasoline.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
5. More likely your comp runs on coal. Maybe nuke with a slight chance of natural gas.
Sat Jan 26, 2013, 11:07 AM
Jan 2013

Agreed, we don't need dirty energy. So, we fund other means to try to make a dent. It's a long battle.

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
7. Mostly on coal, a third on natural gas.
Sat Jan 26, 2013, 11:11 AM
Jan 2013

Before 2012 about 20% on nuclear, then they shut San Onofre down.

In the absence of any other brilliant ideas, nuclear is the way to go.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»In North Dakota, Flames o...