Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pscot

(21,024 posts)
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 09:35 PM Jun 2013

Is Hillary dancing away from AGW

in this statement, or am I misreading it?

"What I think we have to be about is working together, overcoming the lines that divide us, this partisan, cultural, geographic (divide). Building on what we know works, we can take on any challenge we confront," Clinton said. Reflecting the entire family's involvement, the foundation has been renamed the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation.

Clinton's speech at the start of a two-day annual conference touched on themes that could be part of a future Democratic presidential campaign, with the former New York senator stressing the need for private and public partnerships to tackle issues like economic and educational inequality. She said climate change, "financial contagion" and nuclear proliferation were "too complex and cross-cutting" for any one government to solve alone.


Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-turning-toward-nonprofit-world-210136873.html
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
3. I don't think that is evidence that she is
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 10:07 PM
Jun 2013

It is a basic statement of fact as far as I can see. I don't have any idea how she really feels about dealing with the carbon problem, though. Bill didn't do squat.

pscot

(21,024 posts)
4. That's why I asked
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 10:11 PM
Jun 2013

I got the idea she was relegating it to the back burner. There's certainly no sense of urgency suggested there.

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
5. It certainly isn't a full throated roar for action.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 10:18 PM
Jun 2013

I also don't know that I agree with her either. Individual countries, and in some cases individual states in the US are the forces that are making the most difference in our effort to do something. A comprehensive international bargain would be great, but attacking the problem at its economic roots as Obama is doing has a lot to be said for it; especially if you can get a supportive Congress to work with.

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
9. That guy, who never graduated high school, is more articulate than half of Congress
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 12:51 AM
Jun 2013

There are going to have to be some big changes if the U.S. is going to survive.

joshcryer

(62,265 posts)
10. We've already reached the new normal and politicians know climate change is a dud.
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 02:25 AM
Jun 2013

So they won't mention it or address it unless, say, we get 3 Sandy's back to back or 2 Katrinas back to back in the same season. Otherwise the US is standing to be energy self-sufficient with the use of fracking technologies and the long game is to basically wait out the coming crunch. All the while profiting immensely from coal exports.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Is Hillary dancing away f...