Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 01:09 PM Jan 2012

(Alaskan) Natural resources chief wants mission statement change

The commissioner of the state's Department of Natural Resources wants to change the agency's mission statement, and the proposed changed is not sitting well with at least one lawmaker and conservation groups who are worried about a pro-development bent.

The current statement says the department's mission is to "develop, conserve and enhance natural resources for present and future Alaskans," KSKA reported.

The new statement removes "conserve" and "enhance," leaving only "develop" in the statement. It also removes the reference to "future Alaskans."

DNR Commissioner Dan Sullivan said the change is to better fit with wording in the state's constitution, which in part says: "to encourage the settlement of its land and the development of its resources by making them available for maximum use consistent with the public interest."

Read more here: http://www.adn.com/2012/01/29/2289957/dnr-proposes-changes-to-its-mission.html#storylink=cpy

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
(Alaskan) Natural resources chief wants mission statement change (Original Post) XemaSab Jan 2012 OP
Uhhh Dan did you read this part? nykym Jan 2012 #1
So, they've gone for consistency then ... Nihil Feb 2012 #2
 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
2. So, they've gone for consistency then ...
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 05:11 AM
Feb 2012

> The new statement removes "conserve" and "enhance," leaving only
> "develop" in the statement.
+
> It also removes the reference to "future Alaskans."

If they adopt the first part, it solves the issue of the second part.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»(Alaskan) Natural resourc...