Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GoLeft TV

(3,910 posts)
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 10:36 AM Mar 2014

Chevron Evades Justice in Ecuador Pollution Case

From Ring of Fire:

On Tuesday, US District Judge Lewis Kaplan of New York prohibited the enforcement of a $9.5 billion Amazon rainforest pollution judgment against oil giant Chevron Corporation. Kaplan ruled that the judgment was a product of fraud on behalf of Ecuadorian plaintiffs and their attorney Steven Donziger.

According to Amazon Watch, the decision “underscores the threat that well-financed corporations pose to justice and the rule of law with their ability to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on efforts to attack victims and their allies.”

The judgment would have compensated Ecuadorians for Chevron predecessor Texaco’s deliberate dumping of more than 18 billion gallons of toxic wastewater in the Amazon. Between 1964 and 1990, Texaco, which was acquired by Chevron in 2011, drilled for oil in the Amazon rainforest and deliberately dumped billions of gallons of highly toxic sludge into unlined, open-air pits that have seeped into streams and rivers, polluting the means of subsistence for local Ecuadorians.

You can read the full article here at Ring of Fire.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chevron Evades Justice in Ecuador Pollution Case (Original Post) GoLeft TV Mar 2014 OP
In other words, a court invalidating a judgment COLGATE4 Mar 2014 #1
The judgement of a corrupt US court is helping a corrupt US oil company to evade justice. Nihil Mar 2014 #2
What conceivable evidence do you have to COLGATE4 Mar 2014 #4
What the oil companines did to the Amazon is not in dispute SkatmanRoth Mar 2014 #3

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
1. In other words, a court invalidating a judgment
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 11:58 AM
Mar 2014

because of fraud on the part of the Plaintiffs means that the Defendant 'evaded justice'? Fascinating legal theory.

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
2. The judgement of a corrupt US court is helping a corrupt US oil company to evade justice.
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 05:53 AM
Mar 2014

No change there then.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
4. What conceivable evidence do you have to
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 10:33 AM
Mar 2014

assert that the court that decided this case is, as you say "corrupt". That's a very serious charge. I assume you are prepared to substantiate it.

SkatmanRoth

(843 posts)
3. What the oil companines did to the Amazon is not in dispute
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 07:16 AM
Mar 2014

Texaco admitted to dumping waste that found its way into streams and the river. That is a fact.

The reason Chevron gets to walk is the Ecuadorian clients hired a hot-shot lawyer who was more interested in advancing his own career than in achieving justice in a court of law. It was a winnable court case, but Steven Donziger greased the skids to make the case about his grandiose legal expertise and ended up poisoning the proceedings.

Judge Kaplan thought better of ruling on a case slanted by unethical evidence proffered by Donziger. The judge threw the case out and thus Chevron walks.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Chevron Evades Justice in...