Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,583 posts)
Fri May 9, 2014, 08:59 AM May 2014

Frank Rich On Why The GOP Will Never, Ever, Ever Deal With Climate - NY Mag

The White House released an exhaustive and ominous report on climate change this week that attributed a host of destructive weather patterns to rising temperatures and stated “climate change, once considered an issue for a distant future, has moved firmly into the present." Meanwhile, House Science Committee Chair Lamar Smith dubbed the report "a political document intended to frighten Americans.” What do you make of the report? And what would it take for most in the Republican Party to accept the reality and urgency of climate change?

The report confirms in no uncertain terms what sentient Americans already knew, but that doesn’t mean it will break the political gridlock that has doomed any serious national mobilization to address the crisis. Of all the crazy things in our politics, few are more self-immolating than the persistence of climate change as a partisan issue. A founding father of modern environmental activism was a Republican, Teddy Roosevelt, but his legacy is no more honored in today’s GOP than Lincoln’s. You’d think that the speed and perils of global warming would be settled fact, given all the catastrophic signs that Americans can see with their own eyes. But on the right, climate-change denial has become a proxy for a whole smorgasbord of powerful ideological imperatives: opposition to governmental regulation; resistance to taxation (especially of such Republican sugar daddies as the coal, oil, and gas industries); class resentment of intellectual elites in academia and Prius-driving Hollywood; and, in some quarters, rejection of any kind of science that dares undermine the supremacy of God as the primary actor in all Earthly activity.

It’s a pipe dream to think the Republican Party is going to shift on this any time soon. This week there has been a lot of talk about how the establishment candidate in the GOP senatorial primary in North Carolina beat back more radical tea party opponents — but all four candidates in that race, including the more “moderate” victor, were climate-change deniers. As the Times reported today, few areas are more immediately endangered by coastal flooding than Florida, yet the state’s three most prominent Republicans, Senator Marco Rubio, Governor Rick Scott, and Jeb Bush — two of them possible 2016 presidential candidates — are too fearful of their party’s base to acknowledge the peril or call for action. Even the high end of conservative thought leaders are in denial. George Will thinks global warming is merely “weather” and that any alarms have been manufactured by conformist tenure-track professors and writers in The New Yorker. His own personal scientific research, based on observations from the home he owns on an island in South Carolina, tells him that hurricane activity is down post-Katrina, so what’s the problem? Charles Krauthammer has declared that “any scientific theory that explains everything explains nothing” — just the kind of argument that was made to resist the theories of Galileo, Newton, and Darwin. So what will change their thinking? A realization that the younger voters the GOP needs for survival feel as strongly about climate change as they do about gay marriage. Or perhaps further environmental catastrophe that hits red states across the southern half of the country.

EDIT

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/05/frank-rich-why-the-gop-denies-climate-change.html
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Frank Rich On Why The GOP Will Never, Ever, Ever Deal With Climate - NY Mag (Original Post) hatrack May 2014 OP
Considering that our climate in the US is directly affected by the air pollution in China Demeter May 2014 #1
you have to be an idiot to fear your idiot base. mikeysnot May 2014 #2
So it's back to Bibleghazi. postulater May 2014 #3
I thought the brand name was "Benesis" - I may have been mistaken . . . hatrack May 2014 #4
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
1. Considering that our climate in the US is directly affected by the air pollution in China
Fri May 9, 2014, 09:09 AM
May 2014

and that this Administration is doing everything in its power to tick China off, I don't see much hope for California and the dried out West. That's foreign policy blowback in a nutshell.

This Administration is in the business of ticking off everybody (that it doesn't own, body and soul) for Corporate Profits: more pollution, more bad rep for the US. Don't preach to me about how wonderful it is, this Obamaworld. Those golden showers are not what you would like it to be.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Frank Rich On Why The GOP...