Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumSky transport of Bolivia: no congestion, quicker trips to work
Sky transport of Bolivia: no congestion, quicker trips to work
A $234m cable car route linking La Paz and El Alto is offering clean, affordable transport to people in both cities and great views
Sam Jones in La Paz
Wednesday 31 December 2014 07.00 EST
[font size=1]
Cable cars head from El Alto down to La Paz. Photograph: Sam Jones/The Guardian
[/font]
María Eugenia Flores hops out of a bright yellow capsule halfway down a La Paz hillside and pauses to ponder the benefits of the latest addition to the citys vertiginous skyline.
Despite views that induce awe or acute nausea, jittery sweats and the sudden rediscovery of religious faith depending on your tolerance of heights what impresses her most about the cable car system that now links La Paz and its nearby sister city, El Alto, is its sheer tranquility and cleanliness.
I used to have to take the minibus to get to work and that was horrible, says the 37-year-old businesswoman. The cable car is quicker but, best of all, you dont arrive at work with a headache from all the traffic fumes.
The newfound freedom to float safely and quietly over Bolivias administrative capital, far above the taxis and gaudy buses that pump black clouds of smoke into the already thin air is cherished by the people of La Paz and El Alto alike.
More:
http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/dec/31/sky-transport-of-bolivia-no-congestion-quicker-trips-to-work
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)There were other ways but none faster.
Strategically placed, these could really ease traffic in many US cities.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)The Roosevelt Island tram crosses the river, and was probably more cost-effective than putting in a bridge from Manhattan to Roosevelt Island. Where there's no river to deal with, I don't know how many U.S. cities would be willing to put in trams. Their usual solution to traffic seems to be to build more roads -- which induces more traffic.
The best of several photos on Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roosevelt_Island_Tramway#mediaviewer/File:New_Roosevelt_tram_fr_QBB_jeh.jpg
I thought that ending the link with .jpeg would mean that the photo itself would appear in my post, but it doesn't work, so you'll have to click through to see it.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Usually Wikipedia has options for posting images in different sizes and provides better links, see this page:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:New_Roosevelt_tram_fr_QBB_jeh.jpg Offers the different sizes, here's one:
The 59th St Queensboro Bridge passes over Roosevelt Island so no help getting to Manhattan, but the Tram isn't the only way out.
There's a bridge on the east side of the island connecting to Queens.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)DU's own bvar22 provided some photos of three-day-old chicks from his farm, which through his generosity are now in Commons and are included in the relevant Wikipedia articles.
As for Roosevelt Island, I know there's a bridge to Queens, but a bridge to Manhattan would be a much bigger undertaking, because of the need to find the space for the Manhattan anchorage. Without that factor, I'm pessimistic about the chances for more trams in American cities.
Kennah
(14,234 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)Thrilling, and just a bit nerve-wracking the first couple of times.
Santiago also has a great tourist cable-car system, using tiny four-person pods. I felt very vulnerable when we swung out over the first valley, hanging from a cable that felt about as strong as a piece of string! It was a great experience, much different from the solid, boxcar-like cable cars in the Alps.