Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,578 posts)
Thu Mar 26, 2015, 08:20 AM Mar 2015

BP May Leave ALEC, But Big Bucks Still Flow From Oil & Gas To Climate Disinformation (As Always)

For one, BP still channels funds through its political action committee to climate science-denying US policymakers such as senator James Inhofe, chair of the senate’s environment and public works committee. While such direct contributions to politicians are a matter of public record, companies continue to sow climate doubt and influence climate policy in ways that are far more opaque.

For instance, recently released documents show that ExxonMobil gave more than $75,000 between 2008 and 2010 to secretly support the work of Willie Soon, a contrarian climate researcher at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, well after the company announced it would halt such funding. Soon’s research has sought to downplay the human influence on global warming.

This follows revelations that Southern Company, one of the largest utilities in the US, spent $400,000 between 2006 and 2015 to fund Soon, supporting his research, Congressional testimony, and other “deliverables” while specifying that its funding be disclosed only with express company permission. Robert Gehri, the Southern Company employee who authorised this funding was one of a dozen industry representatives who, on behalf of the American Petroleum Institute, created a $6m campaign in 1998 that misled the public about climate science. Among other strategies, he oversaw the covert funding of “independent” scientists.

Some of the largest fossil fuel companies now publicly accepting mainstream climate science, continue to support climate denial through influential lobbying groups and trade associations. Shell, Chevron, and ExxonMobil still fund Alec, which misleadingly describes climate change as “a historical phenomenon for which debate will continue over the significance of natural and [human-caused] contributions.”

EDIT

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/mar/25/fossil-fuel-firms-are-still-bankrolling-climate-denial-lobby-groups

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BP May Leave ALEC, But Big Bucks Still Flow From Oil & Gas To Climate Disinformation (As Always) (Original Post) hatrack Mar 2015 OP
The fact that the MSM imposes forced silence on ALEC should tell you all you need to know. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #1

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
1. The fact that the MSM imposes forced silence on ALEC should tell you all you need to know.
Thu Mar 26, 2015, 09:33 AM
Mar 2015

Once in a while a corporation peels off ALEC membership, after years of giving massive amounts of money, just to make the show appear legit...it is all well thought out.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»BP May Leave ALEC, But Bi...