Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumThere’s a trend here.
Extended excerpt used with permission
"... the trend away from nuclear power and fossil fuels and toward clean energy is only accelerating, all across the world."
Theres a trend here.
This trend is clear: Solar and wind are already cheaper than coal and will become more so; and will beat out natural gas as well. Nuclear is so expensive its off the chart. Chart from Bloomberg New Energy Finance.
Every day I take an hour or two to scan dozens of articles from across the globe on nuclear power and clean energy issues; I select a handful of the best to post on NIRS Twitter and Facebook feeds as well as the COP 21 organizing page on Facebook, along with some Twitter-enforced pithy commentary.
Today I found myself using the word trend twice in a half-dozen post comments. Accurately.
Because the trend away from nuclear power and fossil fuels and toward clean energy is only accelerating, all across the world. Given how low we began, with clean energy even a few years ago providing only a microscopic amount of our electricity supply, rapid and accelerating growth is absolutely necessary. But the pace of the growth still is stunning. The dinosaurs day is coming, and the trend shows that its coming sooner than expected.
A few examples:
*The upcoming release of the annual and invaluable World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2015 indicates that 45% of the worlds people live in countries that now generate more electricity from non-hydro renewables than from their nuclear power. These include four of the worlds five largest economies: China, India, Japan and Germany, along with Brazil, Mexico, Spain and the Netherlands.
When hydro is included, the United Kingdom can be added to the list. The outlier on the list is obvious: the U.S. Although at least the U.S. is growing too, from 8.5 percent renewable (including hydro) in 2007 to 13 percent in 2014. All of that growth comes from non-hydro renewables.
Note that these statistics are not based on capacity (all of these nations have far more nameplate capacity of renewables than nuclear) but on actual generation, where until recently nuclear has been the leader.
*In a story titled The Latest Sign that Coal is Getting Killed, Bloomberg reported Monday that coal companies are finding it increasingly difficult to find needed financing from Wall Street; investors believewith good reasonthat coal is on the way out and they dont want to risk their good money on it. That they are backing off financing for coal-related projects will only hasten the industrys demise.
Bloombergs clients arent motivated by the environment, theyre motivated by profit. And they see solar and wind poweras the chart at the top of the page indicatesas already being more cost-effective than coal and becoming only more so. Nuclear, which is even more expensive than coal, doesnt even enter the equation....
This trend is clear: Solar and wind are already cheaper than coal and will become more so; and will beat out natural gas as well. Nuclear is so expensive its off the chart. Chart from Bloomberg New Energy Finance.
Every day I take an hour or two to scan dozens of articles from across the globe on nuclear power and clean energy issues; I select a handful of the best to post on NIRS Twitter and Facebook feeds as well as the COP 21 organizing page on Facebook, along with some Twitter-enforced pithy commentary.
Today I found myself using the word trend twice in a half-dozen post comments. Accurately.
Because the trend away from nuclear power and fossil fuels and toward clean energy is only accelerating, all across the world. Given how low we began, with clean energy even a few years ago providing only a microscopic amount of our electricity supply, rapid and accelerating growth is absolutely necessary. But the pace of the growth still is stunning. The dinosaurs day is coming, and the trend shows that its coming sooner than expected.
A few examples:
*The upcoming release of the annual and invaluable World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2015 indicates that 45% of the worlds people live in countries that now generate more electricity from non-hydro renewables than from their nuclear power. These include four of the worlds five largest economies: China, India, Japan and Germany, along with Brazil, Mexico, Spain and the Netherlands.
When hydro is included, the United Kingdom can be added to the list. The outlier on the list is obvious: the U.S. Although at least the U.S. is growing too, from 8.5 percent renewable (including hydro) in 2007 to 13 percent in 2014. All of that growth comes from non-hydro renewables.
Note that these statistics are not based on capacity (all of these nations have far more nameplate capacity of renewables than nuclear) but on actual generation, where until recently nuclear has been the leader.
*In a story titled The Latest Sign that Coal is Getting Killed, Bloomberg reported Monday that coal companies are finding it increasingly difficult to find needed financing from Wall Street; investors believewith good reasonthat coal is on the way out and they dont want to risk their good money on it. That they are backing off financing for coal-related projects will only hasten the industrys demise.
Bloombergs clients arent motivated by the environment, theyre motivated by profit. And they see solar and wind poweras the chart at the top of the page indicatesas already being more cost-effective than coal and becoming only more so. Nuclear, which is even more expensive than coal, doesnt even enter the equation....
http://safeenergy.org/2015/07/15/theres-a-trend-here/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 719 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There’s a trend here. (Original Post)
kristopher
Jul 2015
OP
djean111
(14,255 posts)1. And now solar and wind are disruptions. Investments will shift. But I hope the paradigm
of huge grids goes away, too - too vulnerable to weather, hacking, terrorists, accidents, and, I believe, squirrels.
This not only disrupts profits, it disrupts control. IMO and all that.
ALEC is trying mightily to stem the tide, though.