Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:52 AM Oct 2015

Nato’s bombs fall like confetti, not containing conflict but spreading it

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/06/nato-bombs-conflict-syria-isis-iraq-afghanistan

Syria, Isis, Iraq … there are no easy solutions. But killing innocent civilians in Afghanistan and elsewhere draws more people into insurgencies

Nato’s bombs fall like confetti, not containing conflict but spreading it
George Monbiot
Tuesday 6 October 2015 13.47 EDT

‘The strike may have resulted in collateral damage to a nearby medical facility.” This is how an anonymous Nato spokesperson described Saturday’s disaster in Afghanistan. Let’s translate it into English. “We bombed a hospital, killing 22 people.” But “people”, “hospital” and “bomb”, let alone “we”: all such words are banned from Nato’s lexicon. Its press officers are trained to speak no recognisable human language.

The effort is to create distance: distance from responsibility, distance from consequences, distance above all from the humanity of those who were killed. They do not merit even a concrete noun. Whatever you do, do not create pictures in the mind.

“Collateral damage” and “nearby” also suggest that the destruction of the hospital in Kunduz was a side-effect of an attack on another target. But the hospital, run by Médecins Sans Frontières, was the sole target of this bombing raid, by a US plane that returned repeatedly to the scene, dropping more ordnance on a building from which staff and patients were trying to escape. Curiously, on this occasion, Nato did not use that other great euphemism of modern warfare, the “surgical strike” – though it would, for once, have been appropriate.

Shoot first, suppress the questions later. The lies and euphemisms add insult to the crime. Nato’s apparent indifference to life and truth could not fail to infuriate – perhaps to radicalise – people who are currently uninvolved in conflict in Afghanistan.

--

We are now fourteen years into our Afghanistan occupation.

Republicans urge us to stay until the job is done. WHAT'S THE FUCKING JOB?

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nato’s bombs fall like confetti, not containing conflict but spreading it (Original Post) unhappycamper Oct 2015 OP
The plane returned repetadtly to bomb a building with a giant Red Cross symbol? Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #1
Yup. unhappycamper Oct 2015 #2

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
1. The plane returned repetadtly to bomb a building with a giant Red Cross symbol?
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 09:19 AM
Oct 2015

The Pentagon is lying and lying and lying and squirming....crimes were committed and crimes are now bein covered up by propaganda and lies...which are the other bombs the Pentagon drops all the time.

I believe the doctors over the generals.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»Nato’s bombs fall like co...