Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
Tue Jan 7, 2014, 03:01 PM Jan 2014

Bennett: We will not sit in a government that accepts agreement based on 1967 lines

'Peace talks with the Palestinians have only brought terror,' says economy minister and head of Habayit Hayehudi party.
By Barak Ravid | Jan. 7, 2014 | 5:10 PM

Israel's Economy Minister Naftali Bennett said on Tuesday that his Habayit Hayehudi party "will not sit in a coalition that, because of international pressure, divides Jerusalem and puts our security at risk."

Speaking at the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv, Bennett added: "We will never agree to give up a unified Jerusalem… we will never accept an agreement based on the 1967 lines."

"Since the peace talks started there has been a slowly-growing intifada," Bennett said. "Peace talks with the Palestinians have only brought us terror."

"If our friends in the world ask us to commit suicide - even if they have good intentions - we will tell them 'no,'" Bennett said, about the international pressure to reach an agreement with the Palestinians. "They tell us there is an occupation and that it's immoral as Jews. Let me tell you this - we are not occupiers in our land," he said.

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.567491

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bennett: We will not sit in a government that accepts agreement based on 1967 lines (Original Post) Jefferson23 Jan 2014 OP
Good glad we cleared that up. Use the 1947 lines then as starting point on point Jan 2014 #1
The 1947 lines? oberliner Jan 2014 #3
The original boundaries of state of Israel has granted by UN before taking additional land on point Jan 2014 #4
Are you talking about the Partition Plan? oberliner Jan 2014 #5
Maybe they should. Make them flexible. on point Jan 2014 #6
If only the Partition Plan had been accepted in the first place oberliner Jan 2014 #7
"we are not occupiers in our land" That sums up the mindset that team hasbara R. Daneel Olivaw Jan 2014 #2
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
5. Are you talking about the Partition Plan?
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 12:25 PM
Jan 2014

Do you mean the boundaries proposed in the Partition Plan?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Partition_Plan_for_Palestine

I'm pretty sure no one supports that on either side.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
7. If only the Partition Plan had been accepted in the first place
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 09:51 AM
Jan 2014

Maybe now we wouldn't have these problems.

You wrote that you are for a single secular state, but what if the majority of the Israelis and Palestinians end up voting for a religious one? Wouldn't that be their choice to make?

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
2. "we are not occupiers in our land" That sums up the mindset that team hasbara
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 01:30 AM
Jan 2014

will be coy about there.

"All of it belongs to us. Now go fu@k yourself after you give us 3-4 billion for the year."


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Bennett: We will not sit ...