Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:33 AM Mar 2014

Israel/OPT: Further information: Palestinian villagers and Israeli state mediate

PALESTINIAN VILLAGERS AND ISRAELI STATE MEDIATE

The mediation period between Palestinian villagers and the Israeli state was extended until 25 April.

On 2 September 2013 the High Court of Justice suggested that the Palestinian villagers who are threatened
with forced eviction and the Israeli state go into mediation. The High Court of Justice did not rule against
the forced eviction of all the residents of eight villages situated in the hills south-east of Hebron, in the
southern West Bank, to make way for a military training zone, Firing Zone 918, and there are no guarantees
that the mediation process will lead to a resolution that does not violate the rights of the villagers.

The villagers agreed to the process immediately and the Ministry of Defence agreed on 21 October 2013.
Both sides agreed to the appointment of Yitzhak Zamir, retired Supreme Court Judge and former Attorney
General, as mediator. The mediation period was initially set for four months but that was extended.
Meetings have been held regularly between representatives of the villagers and the State Attorney's Office,
who was targeted in the UA Update of 11 September 2013. The State Attorney has mentioned that the
letters he received from Amnesty International activists "left an impression".

The villagers' lawyer has said to Amnesty International that the process is "interesting". The lawyer also
said that the current situation, which allows the villagers to remain in their homes while the mediation is
ongoing, is more positive than the High Court of Justice potentially ruling that the army’s plans could go
ahead. The lawyer attributes this relatively positive situation to the conjunction of local and international
pressure, to which Amnesty International contributed.

http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/MDE15/005/2014/en/5f023df6-25ff-40ff-ac2a-d621bf83eb09/mde150052014en.pdf

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Israel/OPT: Further infor...