Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 01:30 AM Mar 2015

Israeli forces uproot 300 olive trees in Nablus

http://www.maannews.com/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=759794

NABLUS (Ma'an) -- Israeli forces uprooted 300 olive trees on private Palestinian land in the Nablus village of Salem on Monday, Palestinian liaison officials said.

Director of the Nablus District Civil Liaison Office Luay al-Saadi told Ma'an that Israeli bulldozers uprooted the trees 48 hours after his office requested that Palestinian farmers be given access to plow the land.

The fields are located near the illegal Israeli outpost of Havat Skali.

There were at least 329 incidents of settler violence against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank in 2014, according to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Israeli forces uproot 300 olive trees in Nablus (Original Post) R. Daneel Olivaw Mar 2015 OP
That's one weirdly worded blip. Igel Mar 2015 #1

Igel

(35,300 posts)
1. That's one weirdly worded blip.
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 11:58 AM
Mar 2015

So the Israeli bulldozers went in before the Palestinian plows could do the deed?

I mean, that's what it says by any reasonable inferencing. There was land with olive trees on it. The Palestinians wanted to plow it. Hard to plow olive trees. The branches get stuck in the blades.

Presumably the Palestinians owned the land outright with a deed and it wasn't former state land squatted on by virtue of having worked it for so many years. That's been a frequent ploy, whether you like it or lump it. But either way, I don't see how the trees' destruction itself is a big deal. Either way, the trees get it in the roots.

If it really was private, deeded land, it remains private, deeded land and taking it for the settlement would be violation of their deed--rather a larger issue. Either way, no change. Except that now the Palestinians have an easier time plowing it. And the "Israeli bulldozers" part suddenly become fairly inexplicable under any semblance of a reasonable inference.

If they were Israeli--not by that, not just "Israeli owned, and rented by Palestinians" or some such dodge--then a plausible but by no means likely inference is that the land was deemed "privately owned" by the Palestinian side and not by the Israeli side. A state of affairs that has happened fairly often in the last decade. And I'd note that those trees don't look to be exactly ancient.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Israeli forces uproot 300...