LGBT
Related: About this forumJudge Says Republicans Can't Stop DOMA Challenge
A federal judge in Connecticut has denied a request from the House Republican-controlled Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group to halt proceedings in a challenge against the Defense of Marriage Act.
Judge Vanessa Bryant of the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut issued her order Wednesday in the case, Pedersen v. Office of Personnel Management. BLAG filed a motion to stay last month, arguing that the same issues were under consideration in Windsor v. United States, a case now on appeal in the Second Circuit. Both cases challenge section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, which prohibits the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages. Last month, a federal judge in New York ruled DOMA unconstitutional in the Windsor case.
According to Prop 8 Trial Tracker, which first reported on the order, Judge Bryant wrote that BLAG failed to sustain its burden to establish the need for a stay under four factors laid out by the Supreme Court, including (1) whether the stay applicant has made a strong showing that he is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) whether the applicant will be irreparably injured absent a stay; (3) whether the issuance of the stay will substantially injure the other parties interested in the proceeding; and (4) where the public interest lies.
Judge Bryant, a George W. Bush appointee, rejected BLAGs assertion that the Pedersen and Windsor cases are the same, where she noted that in the latter, the standing of the sole plaintiff, Edith Windsor, has been challenged by BLAG, and therefore the Second Circuit could limit its analysis to that question, which would not dispose of the issues under consideration in Pedersen. The judge also wrote that a stay would not conserve judicial economy because the district court was already in the process of drafting a decision, and she said that the plaintiffs would be harmed by a stay at this point. Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, which brought the Pedersen case on behalf of six married couples and a widower being denied federal benefits, made that point when it said it would oppose the motion to stay.
http://www.advocate.com/politics/marriage-equality/2012/07/05/blag-request-stop-doma-challenge-denied