Other than DU, where do you get your Feminist news and information?

[Catherina]

I'll post mine but please share

I read these at least once a week

http://tigerbeatdown.com/
http://pandagon.net
http://feministing.com/
http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/
http://www.racialicious.com/
http://bitchmagazine.org/
http://www.womanist-musings.com/


And then there's everything and anything by bell hooks and Sunera Thobani

[TeeYiYi]

1. ”Other than DU”....

...lolz!

Thanks for the list...

TYY

[libodem]

2. What is

Bitch magazine? I thought that was a banned word. BTW I see a member who has bitch in her DU name. Offended.

[TeeYiYi]

3. Are you being sarcastic? ...

...about being offended?

TYY

[libodem]

5. yes

[TeeYiYi]

7. I'm so relieved! ...nt

TYY

[libodem]

9. I am pretty sarcastic

I know there's a smilie for that somewhere.

[Catherina]

4. Here's the magazine's FAQ

Here's the magazine's FAQ: http://bitchmagazine.org/frequently-asked-questions#magazine

The content on the website is different than the print content. I can't get my hands on the printed magazines anymore but their web content is very good too.

Take for example this article on human trafficking

“Human trafficking” is a relatively new term to describe the selling and trading of people. While it had been used in policy contexts in the past (as in the 1949 Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others), it entered common parlance around 2000 with the passage of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act. A quick search on a news database shows that there were only three references to “human trafficking” or “trafficking in humans” before 2000. It was mentioned 9 times in 2000, 41 times in 2001, and broke 100 mentions for the first time in 2005. In 2010, there were more than 500 references.

The proliferation of the term signifies a rhetorical shift on the part of the U.S. government. Simply put, framing forced migration and labor (sexual and otherwise) as the work of international criminal enterprises, comparable to the smuggling of drugs and weapons, elides the reality that it is a social and economic issue arising from poverty, economic disparities, globalization, and unreasonable restrictions on migration. The U.S. government’s approach places the focus squarely on identifiable enemies who are often construed, like the kidnappers in Taken, as evil, sadistic, ethnic Others—ignoring the ways in which capitalist social and economic structures (some of which the U.S. government has actively promoted) make people vulnerable.

As a result, the United States’ recent committment to a “War on Trafficking” mimics previous efforts—the epically failed “War on Drugs,” the nightmarish “War on Terror”—copying the “Just Say No” urgings of the former and the “Either you’re with us or you’re against us” rhetoric of the latter and offering an easy, black-and-white worldview that lacks structural analysis into systems of inequality and domination.

...

Given this background, it is not surprising that SCTNow, along with similar anti-trafficking concerns, uses a simplistic language of good and evil in its discussions of trafficking. In this way, its selling of the anti-trafficking movement closely mirrors the selling of the “War on Terror” in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks. Instead of untangling the resentment against American imperialism built up globally through centuries of exploitation, many Americans rushed to accept the nonsensical explanation, put forth by politicans and pundits, that terrorists “hate us because they hate freedom.” We wanted enemies that we could name and locate so that we might destroy them, not lessons in humility and self-reflection. Likewise, today’s mainstream anti-trafficking movement appeals to middle-class Americans with the idea that trafficking happens because there are bad people out there just waiting to take your kids away from schools and malls. Thus, its prevention efforts focus less on the systemic realities of poverty, racism, domestic abuse, and the dire circumstances surrounding runaway and thrownaway youth, and more on installing high-tech security cameras at schools and stationing more security guards at malls. And it measures the success of its activities by the number of criminal convictions it achieves, rather than by the long-term health and well-being of the women and children who are most at risk.

...

http://bitchmagazine.org/article/trade-secrets

[libodem]

8. Thank you

I checked it out. My cup of tea.

[maddezmom]

6. thanks, bookmarked

I usually just use key words that are of interest to me and search. But I do follow a few blogs and now will have more.

[Catherina]

10. If you find any good ones, please share

I want to expand my reading list.

[JoeyT]

11. Besides Pandagon,

which I love but rarely comment at:

Alas, A Blog: http://www.amptoons.com/blog/
http://finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com/

[Catherina]

12. Thank you! Brilliant

They both look great but the second one looks a little more complicated. I'm leaving the tab to the "Introduction frontpage" open for reading in the morning.

I'm reading Derailing for Dummies right now. Brilliant!

Whilst seemingly simple on the surface, there is some intertwining subtext embedded within this one.First of all, you’re placing responsibility for your education back onto the Marginalised Person™. As they are obviously engaged with these issues, and care about them, they are hopeful that Privileged People® may one day start listening and taking onboard what they have to say. By placing responsibility to educate in their hands, you tug at this yearning. You may even successfully make many question themselves and their selfish expectations that you utilise the hundreds upon hundreds of resources on the subject available to you as a Privileged Person®! After all, anyone who expects you to be able to research a topic by yourself also clearly expects you to be far more of a functioning adult than you’re acting!

By insisting you can only learn if they right then and there sacrifice further hours of time going over the same ground they have so often in the past, you may also make them give up and go away altogether, enabling you to win by default. But further, you give the impression that you really want to learn, but they’re holding you back! That’s right, using this tactic you can suggest that full understanding is what you crave – you want to be a better, more connected and compassionate person – but it’s not your fault! Nobody ever gave you the education! And now that someone is here who is so obviously qualified, they’re denying you your Privilege® given right to have everything you want handed to you on a platter!

Which brings us to another key component of this argument – it is very important, in conversations with Marginalised People™, to constantly remind them that you are, indeed, Privileged®. By demonstrating your belief that Marginalised People™ should immediately gratify your every whim, you remind them of their place in society. After all, they’re not there to live lives free of discrimination and in happy, independent and fulfilling ways! Please! Marginalised People™ exist for your curiosity and to make you generally feel better about your place in society and don’t let them forget it!

Point one to you!

http://finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com/resources/mirror-derailing-for-dummies/

[yardwork]

13. Thanks for posting this!