Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,822 posts)
Mon Aug 4, 2014, 04:40 PM Aug 2014

Study: Wide Hospital Quality Gap on Maternity Care

Where a woman delivers her baby can make a major difference to her own health — a quality gap that remains largely hidden from mothers-to-be.

A new study comparing hospitals nationwide finds that women who delivered at low-performing facilities suffered more than twice the rate of major complications for vaginal births. For cesarean section deliveries, the disparity was even greater: nearly a fivefold difference, according to the study in Monday's issue of Health Affairs.

But try to figure out which hospital in your area provides better care and odds are you'll be frustrated. There's no comprehensive database that women and their families can rely on to find the best hospitals ahead of time.

That appears to be changing. Spurred in part by the new research, medical groups such as the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists are working on a consumer-friendly database that will tap clinical information from electronic medical records. That effort could take another three to five years.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2014/08/04/us/politics/ap-us-childbirth-complications.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&version=WireFeed&module=pocket-region&region=pocket-region&WT.nav=pocket-region

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Study: Wide Hospital Quality Gap on Maternity Care (Original Post) elleng Aug 2014 OP
Low performance places need to be brought into compliance or shut down Warpy Aug 2014 #1
Interesting. elleng Aug 2014 #2
When I worked in neonatal VA_Jill Aug 2014 #3
This is the real problem, right here. hedgehog Aug 2014 #4
You are SO right! VA_Jill Aug 2014 #5

Warpy

(111,222 posts)
1. Low performance places need to be brought into compliance or shut down
Mon Aug 4, 2014, 04:56 PM
Aug 2014

Uncomplicated home birth is safer than some of those places. I lived in an area in Mass. where home birth with experienced midwives was overtaking hospital births because the OB-Gyn practice in the area was piss poor and they had successfully lobbied against other docs in the area gaining privileges for years.

Friends with complications went to a hospital an hour away rather than chance it at the local place.

elleng

(130,822 posts)
2. Interesting.
Mon Aug 4, 2014, 05:03 PM
Aug 2014

How can one know in advance whether the birth will be 'uncomplicated?' My 2 daughters have given birth in the past 8 months, and as they both appeared initially to be uncomplicated, they both had what I'd call 'complications' in later hours. Both might have needed cesareans, and they ended up avoiding such due to talented docs (from what I could tell.)

VA_Jill

(9,962 posts)
3. When I worked in neonatal
Mon Aug 4, 2014, 05:35 PM
Aug 2014

we used to have a saying, "Failure to progress is whatever the doc says it is." We had one OB whose C-section rate was far and away higher than that of all the other docs. He never got called on it either. I always said I wouldn't let him deliver my dog's puppies because I didn't trust him. If I had it to do over again, I'd have midwives, but there wasn't that option when I was having kids.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
4. This is the real problem, right here.
Tue Aug 5, 2014, 12:13 PM
Aug 2014

We have a culture in which the doctor's word comes down from on high, and no one questions it. And you've heard of the Blue Code of Silence? That is nothing compared to the White Code - doctors know exactly who among them is doing a great job, and acceptable job and a terrible job, but until people start dying in obvious ways, nothing is said or done.

I think surgeons are the worst - too many get their up-dated training from medical supply outfits pushing their new equipment. The FDA oversees new drugs, but no one oversees new surgical procedures.

I think some medical society groups are moving to change things - for example - by requiring continuing education credits to maintain certification. Buried deep in the ACA are steps to identify good doctors and to look at what procedures are done, where they are done, and how effective different procedures are. For example - IIRC, there is a significantly higher rate of hysterectomies in the South East than in the North East. Why?

VA_Jill

(9,962 posts)
5. You are SO right!
Tue Aug 5, 2014, 06:39 PM
Aug 2014

About a lot of things. I didn't work in surgery because I couldn't stand surgeons, and I got out of neonatal after awhile and found a home in critical care, which is a whole different animal…you get some respect from the docs there, and most of them treat you like a colleague because you're all in the trenches together. And the docs there have to keep up, or they don't last long. It's a tough place but critical care and step-down are the best places to be, IMO.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»Study: Wide Hospital Qual...