Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Health
Related: About this forumRevealed: no need to add cancer-risk nitrites to ham
Source: The Observer
Revealed: no need to add cancer-risk nitrites to ham
Confidential meat industry report shows additives do not prevent food poisoning
Jamie Doward
Sat 23 Mar 2019 15.00 GMT
A bombshell internal report written for the British meat industry reveals nitrites do not protect against botulism the chief reason ham and bacon manufacturers say they use the chemicals.
The study, conducted for the British Meat Processors Association (BMPA) by the scientific consultancy Campden, and marked confidential, examines the growth of the toxin Clostridium botulinum in the processing of bacon and ham.
It is understood that the paper, seen by the Observer, was commissioned to provide evidence that nitrites, which have long been linked to cancer, are essential to protect consumers from food poisoning and, in particular, botulism, a potentially fatal disease. But, in what appears to be a major blow to the industrys claims, the research found there was no significant growth of the bacteria in either the nitrite-free or the nitrite-cured samples that were tested.
The paper concludes: The results show that there is no change in levels of inoculated C botulinum over the curing process, which implies that the action of nitrite during curing is not toxic to C botulinum spores at levels of 150ppm (parts per million) ingoing nitrite and below.
-snip-
Confidential meat industry report shows additives do not prevent food poisoning
Jamie Doward
Sat 23 Mar 2019 15.00 GMT
A bombshell internal report written for the British meat industry reveals nitrites do not protect against botulism the chief reason ham and bacon manufacturers say they use the chemicals.
The study, conducted for the British Meat Processors Association (BMPA) by the scientific consultancy Campden, and marked confidential, examines the growth of the toxin Clostridium botulinum in the processing of bacon and ham.
It is understood that the paper, seen by the Observer, was commissioned to provide evidence that nitrites, which have long been linked to cancer, are essential to protect consumers from food poisoning and, in particular, botulism, a potentially fatal disease. But, in what appears to be a major blow to the industrys claims, the research found there was no significant growth of the bacteria in either the nitrite-free or the nitrite-cured samples that were tested.
The paper concludes: The results show that there is no change in levels of inoculated C botulinum over the curing process, which implies that the action of nitrite during curing is not toxic to C botulinum spores at levels of 150ppm (parts per million) ingoing nitrite and below.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/food/2019/mar/23/nitrites-ham-bacon-cancer-risk-additives-meat-industry-confidential--report
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1307 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Revealed: no need to add cancer-risk nitrites to ham (Original Post)
Eugene
Mar 2019
OP
Good to know.
erronis
(15,170 posts)2. Isn't it obvious to discerning consumers that "nitrates, nitrites" are there to sneak sodium
into your food?
Sodium Chloride (NaCl - table salt), Mono-sodium glutamate (MSG), sodium nitrite/nitrate/etc.
I'm a huge salt (NaCl) lover but I know that too much sodium in my diet is bad. Some potassium (KCl) can be substituted but it doesn't give the same satisfaction.
Common salt (NaCl) has been used for millennia to preserve foods - for good reason: pathogens don't like a highly saline environment. Neither do our bodies.
Sodium nitrite may have some preservative effect but it is probably more of a by-product of the rendering of carcasses in a highly saline solution.
WDIK?