Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The main puzzle is why children, so far, has been spared (Original Post) question everything Mar 2020 OP
This is also the first generation Aquaria Mar 2020 #1
Everything I have read SCantiGOP Mar 2020 #2
This COVID-19 has this feature of sparing the children especially, and those under 50 as a abqtommy Mar 2020 #3
They are talking about newborns question everything Mar 2020 #4
I wrote my original reply using what information I've already gathered about COVID-19 abqtommy Mar 2020 #5
 

Aquaria

(1,076 posts)
1. This is also the first generation
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 12:45 PM
Mar 2020

Not to have daily or widespread exposure to tobacco smoke.

But the cleaner lung hypothesis is still only that—a hypothesis. For now.

We may have been lucky that kids have managed to avoid deleterious effects from the virus, thus far.

One factor might be that parents are more likely to take their kids to a doctor over a high fever right away and follow through with a treatment plan than they’ll do for themselves. Getting some kind of treatment in the early stages may be the key to pulling through.

SCantiGOP

(13,862 posts)
2. Everything I have read
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 02:25 PM
Mar 2020

both the apparent lack of infection and serious side effects in children, and the extremely high mortality rate among older people, is all tied to their immune systems. Children before puberty are still strengthening their immune systems which run at a high rate all the time.
Once you hit about 50 years old, your immune system starts to decline.

This all reminds me of a comment a professor made in a college biology course. She said to keep in mind that thousands of years of evolution had designed us to live only until we were in our late 30s. By then, women were not bearing children and men were probably too broken down by injury and disease to be helpful to the tribe as hunters. A non-productive person in a small group that has a daily struggle to get enough to eat and survive is a liability, so life after 40 was not a trait that was adapted by natural selection.

abqtommy

(14,118 posts)
3. This COVID-19 has this feature of sparing the children especially, and those under 50 as a
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 02:34 PM
Mar 2020

feature. I've wondered if the resistance of children has been increased by the fact that most children
get a regular treatment of vaccinations... That's just something I've thought about and have no other proof for.

abqtommy

(14,118 posts)
5. I wrote my original reply using what information I've already gathered about COVID-19
Thu Mar 12, 2020, 03:48 PM
Mar 2020

mortality, especially this chart based on age...

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100213014772

There you'll see that age group 0-9 shows zero fatalities... Thanks for your input.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»The main puzzle is why ch...