The Bible Tells Us A Fetus Becomes A Living Being When It Draws Its First Breath

[SunSeeker]

Some Bible quotes for the next time someone says they oppose abortion because the Bible says it's murder:

Many people think that a human being is created at the time of conception but this belief is not supported by the bible. The fact that a living sperm penetrates a living ovum resulting in the formation of a living fetus does not mean that the fetus is a living human being. According to the bible, a fetus is not a living person with a soul until after drawing its first breath.

After God formed man in Genesis 2: 7, He “breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and it was then that the man became a living being”. Although the man was fully formed by God in all respects, he was not a living being until after taking his first breath.

In Job 33:4, it states: “The spirit of God has made me, and the breath of the Almighty gives me life.”

Again, to quote Ezekiel 37:5&6, “Thus says the Lord God to these bones: Behold, I will cause breath to enter you, and you shall live. And I will lay sinews upon you, and will cause flesh to come upon you, and cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and you shall live; and you shall know that I am the Lord.”

In Exodus 21:22 it states that if a man causes a woman to have a miscarriage, he shall be fined; however, if the woman dies then he will be put to death. It should be apparent from this that the aborted fetus is not considered a living human being since the resulting punishment for the abortion is nothing more than a fine; it is not classified by the bible as a capital offense.

http://www.thechristianleftblog.org/blog-home/the-bible-tells-us-when-a-fetus-becomes-a-living-being

[RayLib]

1. I've pointed that out, but been countered with...

Luke 1:41When Elizabeth heard Mary’s greeting, the baby leaped in her womb, and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit.... 44 As soon as the sound of your greeting reached my ears, the baby in my womb leaped for joy.

How would you respond to those verse that say the baby leaped for joy, in her womb? I am at a loss on that...

[uppityperson]

2. You are outside the SOP of this forum so I am blocking you. Here is the SOP to explain

Last edited Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:09 PM - Edit history (1)

Statement of Purpose

A place for like-minded progressive individuals, to collaborate on ideas to protect the right of every woman to make personal reproductive health decisions and choices.

[uhnope]

3. OMG are you joking?

that DUer just entertained the question with some pretty interesting info. Blocking for that? Jeez no debate allowed at all, I guess.

[uppityperson]

7. This group is for a narrowly defined purpose. Debate on pro/anti choice is more appropriate for GD.

Here is the Statement of Purpose for this group to further elucidate.

A place for like-minded progressive individuals, to collaborate on ideas to protect the right of every woman to make personal reproductive health decisions and choices.

Please stay within this SOP wrote posting in this group. You are correct that the group is not for debate. GD is the place to go for debate. Thank you.

[uppityperson]

9. FWIW, you might notice they were banned also.

[beam me up scottie]

4. AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

On Sat Dec 5, 2015, 11:26 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

You are outside the SOP of this forum so I am blocking you.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1152&pid=1341

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

This response is quite the rude rejoinder to someone with a legitimate question "how would you respond..." to something that has been thrown at the poster.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Dec 5, 2015, 11:35 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: How is this rude? A host of this group is simply explaining why they are blocking this poster from a protected group.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: A thread on pro choice and the friggen bible? Pleeze!!

Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alerter should be ashamed.

[uppityperson]

5. Thanks. I guess I didn't make it clear that I am a Host and enforcing SOP. I think it good

Last edited Wed Dec 9, 2015, 10:47 PM - Edit history (1)

to tell people why they are blocked.

[beam me up scottie]

6. I agree, transparency is better.

By posting the reason for blocking everyone can learn what is and is not appropriate in protected groups.

I know rude (trust me) and you were not rude in the least.

[Kath1]

10. Thank you.

[dembotoz]

8. to block was only proper