Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumGun policies must be chosen by universities
Make no mistake, the Second Amendment is vital to our nations founding principles, and a reasonable defense of Americans rights to bear arms should never be suppressed. Unfortunately, the NRA and many of the legislators they support have taken that defense to an untenable extreme.
Earlier this month in the Idaho legislature, a bill was introduced by NRA lobbyist Dakota Moore that would do something many NRA members might dislike. It would take away local policy control in favor of a centralized government mandate. As the text of the bill itself reads, It is the legislature's intent to wholly occupy the field of firearms regulation within this state.
Apparently this is all well and good, provided that centralized government mandate grants increased rights to gun owners. The bill itself would disallow universities, state colleges and community colleges from regulating or banning the possession of firearms on their campuses. Although an exception is made for residence halls and public entertainment facilities, there is still extensive disapproval of the bill.
http://www.iowastatedaily.com/opinion/article_ec971a80-a957-11e3-8e76-0019bb2963f4.html
hack89
(39,171 posts)It is not complicated.
Token Republican
(242 posts)is being challenged by this kind of thinking.
But Secular is onto something. The is a trend to reduce the bill of rights on campus.
Example and discussion of Universities try to limit First Amendment
Discussion of reduced 4th amendment on college
Of course, if a right can be taken away, then its not really a right.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)It eliminates confusing patchwork laws within a state.
Bazinga
(331 posts)Private universities have every right to say "Don't like our policies? Go to school somewhere else."
Public universities, on the other hand, as a service provided by the state and paid for by its citizens, should not have a similar right to deny enrollment to qualified state residents, because they wouldn't have the option to go somewhere else. Disarmament should not be a condition of participating in a public service, unless that service is willing to provide sufficient security for its participants.
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)if the admins think concealed carry will endanger people.
For students, concealed carry disqualifies all traditional students except half of the senior class due to the age requirements.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)We will instill fear and loathing in the little ones with "gun free zone" signs and metal detectors.
We will have zero tolerance policies for gun shape pop tarts, hand gestures, etc.
Oh, wait, we're already doing this!
Good job, gun hate absolutists and gun grab apologists!!!
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Having run into a legislative brickwall, they seem intent on washing gun images away through a myriad of peculiar and soft rules. Where best to start than in that hotbed of rules fetishers, Public Schools.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)We have already seen children gunned down for nothing more than carrying an airsoft rifle because of the hysteria and assumptions of evil intent.
Straw Man
(6,623 posts)... and here I thought most progressives wouldn't approve of local governments deciding which enumerated rights they would like to deny.