Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Mon Mar 24, 2014, 01:04 PM Mar 2014

Dianne Feinstein pushes for semi-automatic rifle import ban based on 45-year-old law

California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein is circulating a letter on Capitol Hill calling once again for a ban on semi-automatic rifles and asking for President Barack Obama to keep his State of the Union promise to make 2014 a “year of action.”

Citing the Gun Control Act of 1968, Feinstein states, “In recent years… importers of firearms have taken advantage of ATF’s interpretation of the ‘sporting purposes’ test to evade the import ban.”

The phrase contained in The Gun Control Act of 1968 Feinstein is referencing prohibits the importation of firearms that are not “generally recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes.” She claims that in recent years firearms importers have taken advantage of ATF’s interpretation of “sporting purposes” to circumvent the ban.

Although Feinstein recognizes that the firearms are designed for civilian use and never manufactured or used by any standing army, she maintained that “many semiautomatic firearms on the market today do not have a military origin but are modeled closely after military firearms.”

http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/20/dianne-feinstein-pushes-for-semi-automatic-rifle-import-ban-based-on-45-year-old-law/
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dianne Feinstein pushes for semi-automatic rifle import ban based on 45-year-old law (Original Post) SecularMotion Mar 2014 OP
I believe in the right to keep and bear... Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2014 #1
Thus the fallacy of trying to define an "assault weapon" krispos42 Mar 2014 #2
She must be working for domestic arms manufacturers hack89 Mar 2014 #3
looks like I better hurry and get that Krink I've been planning SQUEE Mar 2014 #4
Isn't her husband heavily involved with military contracting? Eleanors38 Mar 2014 #6
I am under the impression is it construction that he does. ManiacJoe Mar 2014 #7
Danger! Danger everywhere she looks... ileus Mar 2014 #5
And water is wet Token Republican Mar 2014 #8
I'll believe she has the best interests of the people at heart when -- Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2014 #9
Add to that a reasonable MJ stance. N/T beevul Mar 2014 #10
 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
1. I believe in the right to keep and bear...
Mon Mar 24, 2014, 02:53 PM
Mar 2014

But I do not believe ANYTHING published in Tucker Carlson's vicious RW rag...

I will concede, however, that Feinstein is kind of a numb nuts when it comes to firearm regulations...

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
2. Thus the fallacy of trying to define an "assault weapon"
Mon Mar 24, 2014, 03:00 PM
Mar 2014

The military develops ways of holding a gun that are somewhat superior (more comfortable, more ergonomic, more controllable, etc) and because the MILITARY did it... it should be banned banned banned!


Bullshit. If she had the courage of her convictions, she would push for a universal ban on semi-autos.


This is culture war. "People that like military-ish guns are part of a dangerous culture that I must destroy" is her attitude.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
3. She must be working for domestic arms manufacturers
Mon Mar 24, 2014, 03:39 PM
Mar 2014

what a boon to AR-15 sales if the president does what she wants.

SQUEE

(1,315 posts)
4. looks like I better hurry and get that Krink I've been planning
Mon Mar 24, 2014, 03:46 PM
Mar 2014

for my next SBR build...
Wait who am I kidding, DiFi is really only effective at selling guns for the panic industry... Almost makes one wonder.

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
7. I am under the impression is it construction that he does.
Mon Mar 24, 2014, 07:46 PM
Mar 2014


Lots of gov contracts seem to go his way.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
5. Danger! Danger everywhere she looks...
Mon Mar 24, 2014, 06:02 PM
Mar 2014

Of course the 1% will oppose the 99's ability to defend themselves.

 

Token Republican

(242 posts)
8. And water is wet
Tue Mar 25, 2014, 08:26 AM
Mar 2014

"If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them . . . Mr. and Mrs. America, turn 'em all in, I would have done it. I could not do that. The votes weren't here."


http://www.mrctv.org/videos/feinstein-discussing-assault-weapons-ban-95-if-i-could-have-gotten-votes-outright-ban-i-would-have-done-it

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
9. I'll believe she has the best interests of the people at heart when --
Tue Mar 25, 2014, 04:29 PM
Mar 2014

1. She takes violations of unreasonable search and seizure seriously and not just when it happens to her.

2. She stops the graft enriching her husband.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Dianne Feinstein pushes f...