Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

doxydad

(1,363 posts)
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 06:38 AM Jul 2014

INFO at a glance: Gun violence since Newtown.....

Here’s a look at some stats on guns — the deaths and school shootings, America’s public opinion and the failed Congressional attempt to take action — in the wake of the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, that killed 27 people, including 20 children and the shooter.
Number of people killed by guns, including homicide, suicide and accidental death, between Newtown and December 2013 (that have been reported by the media): 12,042

Number of people killed by guns so far in 2014: 4,772

Estimated real number of people killed by guns, including homicide, suicide and accidental death since Newtown (using most recent CDC estimates for yearly data): 51,158

Total gun deaths in 2010 (the latest year for which the CDC posts data): 31,672
number of those who were children or teens: 2,700

Number of school shootings since Newtown: 79*




No more guns. Stop the slaughter.

http://billmoyers.com/2013/05/03/gun-violence-since-newtown/

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
INFO at a glance: Gun violence since Newtown..... (Original Post) doxydad Jul 2014 OP
Still flogging that deceptive "school shootings" number I see. hack89 Jul 2014 #1
There is no lie. flamin lib Jul 2014 #7
If someone committed suicide at 2am in the playground it did count hack89 Jul 2014 #8
Yes they did give the definition key gejohnston Jul 2014 #9
They meant to mislead by giving the sources for the number and the definition used? Really? nt flamin lib Jul 2014 #10
it worked didn't it? gejohnston Jul 2014 #11
You're starting to sound like the conspiracy theorists who think flamin lib Jul 2014 #12
not at all gejohnston Jul 2014 #13
Psyops? Propaganda classes? I stand by my post re conspiracy theorists. nt flamin lib Jul 2014 #15
Well, I know what your Army MOS wasn't gejohnston Jul 2014 #16
Look, you're the one accusing MDA of practicing PSYOPS and propaganda techniques. flamin lib Jul 2014 #17
one has nothing to do with the other gejohnston Jul 2014 #18
Every advertising firm uses facets of both of these shedevil69taz Jul 2014 #19
To liken PSYOPS to advertising is beyond idiotic. nt flamin lib Jul 2014 #20
So crack down on violent criminals and fix mental health care. hack89 Jul 2014 #2
You might be a little more believable if you would stop using that many times IronGate Jul 2014 #3
No more guns? Straw Man Jul 2014 #4
Staking out the usual Extreme Prohibitionist Position. Eleanors38 Jul 2014 #5
I'm not so sure. beevul Jul 2014 #6
I guess the 2 dispositions are not incompatible, extremism Eleanors38 Jul 2014 #14
The hilarious part of it is that they haven't figured pablo_marmol Jul 2014 #21
I wish I could share in the mirth. In Texas (and elsewhere) Eleanors38 Jul 2014 #26
Actually, I typically say something along the lines of....... pablo_marmol Jul 2014 #27
I get your drift. Eleanors38 Jul 2014 #28
Oh lookie........a bloodied map of the U.S.! pablo_marmol Jul 2014 #22
By all means, doxydad -- let's attempt to suppress the truth pablo_marmol Jul 2014 #23
Interesting. beevul Jul 2014 #24
I guess the OP could not defend his post, and ran away. n/t oneshooter Jul 2014 #25

hack89

(39,171 posts)
1. Still flogging that deceptive "school shootings" number I see.
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 09:01 AM
Jul 2014

lying for a good cause is still lying.

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)
7. There is no lie.
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 02:31 PM
Jul 2014

MAIG posted the source and definition they used in the publication. It was and is there for everyone to see.

If two students shot each other during school hours across from the street from the school it didn't count.

You may not like the definition chosen but there was no attempt to hide it. Its not a lie just because you say so long and loud.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
8. If someone committed suicide at 2am in the playground it did count
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 03:08 PM
Jul 2014

If you only count shootings on school property where students or faculty were in danger, the number is 15.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
9. Yes they did give the definition key
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 03:39 PM
Jul 2014

but the goal was to mislead bloggers and reporters that are too stupid and too lazy to read past the headline. Using their definition my high school had a school shooting every Thursday for 50+ years. The fact that it happened to be the rifle club in the indoor range after school hours isn't relevant, just like gang hits two blocks from a school and 2AM suicides in the parking lot.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
11. it worked didn't it?
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 05:11 PM
Jul 2014

media sources reported some as "mini Sandy Hooks". How many of the media sources actually mentioned the clarification? One that I know of.
As a PR professional, Watts knew what I explained would happen.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
13. not at all
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 05:55 PM
Jul 2014

IIRC, it was MDA that used the term "mini Sandy Hooks". I do know that I first heard the term last year. This guy certainly did last year. http://oscarocelot.kinja.com/. I put the term in quotation marks because it was their term, not mine.
What you are more likely hearing is someone who, in my world travels, learned about and took classes in things like psychological operations, propaganda, and advertising. You learn a lot of things in military history. For some reason, I found the histories of PsyOps and personnel policy fascinating.

Speaking of "conspiracy theories" I found this old DU thread
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4086438

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)
17. Look, you're the one accusing MDA of practicing PSYOPS and propaganda techniques.
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 07:13 PM
Jul 2014

I'll let others decide if you are a paranoid conspiracy nut. See ya.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
18. one has nothing to do with the other
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 08:00 PM
Jul 2014

Last edited Wed Jul 16, 2014, 09:02 PM - Edit history (1)

actually MDA is practicing disinformation and deception.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2014/jun/13/everytown-gun-safety/have-there-been-74-school-shootings-sandy-hook-clo/
Others will see it for the attempted ad hominem, the lowest of all logical fallacies, that it is. I like to think most DUers are better critical thinkers than that.

shedevil69taz

(512 posts)
19. Every advertising firm uses facets of both of these
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 10:58 AM
Jul 2014

in order to sell products to people everyday. Why wouldn't a well funded organization like MDA use it?

 

IronGate

(2,186 posts)
3. You might be a little more believable if you would stop using that many times
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 09:31 AM
Jul 2014

debunked 79 school shootings meme.

When you say no more guns, how do you propose to do that?

Straw Man

(6,623 posts)
4. No more guns?
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 09:34 AM
Jul 2014

So you're advocating a total ban on private ownership of firearms? I just want to be clear on your position.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
5. Staking out the usual Extreme Prohibitionist Position.
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 10:32 AM
Jul 2014

Increasingly, the controller-banners who post here are more & more extreme about prohibition. They will assure a continued liberalizing of gun laws.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
6. I'm not so sure.
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 01:00 PM
Jul 2014

"Increasingly, the controller-banners who post here are more & more extreme about prohibition".


I'm not so sure.


I think they may be becoming more honest.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
26. I wish I could share in the mirth. In Texas (and elsewhere)
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 10:37 PM
Jul 2014

we have to deal with that crap. Wendy Davis & Van dePutt can shoot up the range & take a limit if dove, but they still have to answer for Feinstein & Wasserman-Shultz. Coast-to-coast.

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)
27. Actually, I typically say something along the lines of.......
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 02:41 AM
Jul 2014

the behavior would be hilarious were it not so politically devastating.

Mea culpa, mi amigo.

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)
22. Oh lookie........a bloodied map of the U.S.!
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 02:15 PM
Jul 2014

Yeah ------ that'll convince thinking men and women that you have a case!

No wonder so many people erroneously believe that overall gun violence is on the increase.

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)
23. By all means, doxydad -- let's attempt to suppress the truth
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 02:27 PM
Jul 2014

by engaging in cheap emotion-baiting!

http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/05/07/gun-homicide-rate-down-49-since-1993-peak-public-unaware/

Mass shootings are a matter of great public interest and concern. They also are a relatively small share of shootings overall. According to a Bureau of Justice Statistics review, homicides that claimed at least three lives accounted for less than 1% of all homicide deaths from 1980 to 2008. These homicides, most of which are shootings, increased as a share of all homicides from 0.5% in 1980 to 0.8% in 2008, according to the bureau’s data.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
24. Interesting.
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 05:30 PM
Jul 2014

It is...interesting...to compare these two maps, and note the differences of looking at it by "rate" in the first map which comes from slate, and looking at it in a more actual sense in the second map.





The "actual" map seems to paint a different picture of the problem than the "rate" map does.





Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»INFO at a glance: Gun vio...