Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

beergood

(470 posts)
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 04:10 PM Sep 2015

has anyone read this article?

"That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there." -- George Orwell1

Let’s start with this: The citizen’s right to possess firearms is a fundamental political right. The political principle at stake is quite simple: to deny the state the monopoly of armed force. This should perhaps be stated in the obverse: to empower the citizenry, to distribute the power of armed force among the citizenry as a whole. The history of arguments and struggles over this principle, throughout the world, is long and clear. Instituted in the context of a revolutionary struggle based on the most democratic concepts of its day, the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution is perhaps the clearest legal/constitutional expression of this principle, and as such, I think, is one of the most radical statutes in the world.
- See more at: http://www.thepolemicist.net/2013/01/the-rifle-on-wall-left-argument-for-gun.html#sthash.33tAWV42.vPywAvvk.dpuf

It often seems to me that guns are to liberals what drugs are to conservatives. Liberals respond to to the real damage that guns do as factors that exacerbate (but do not cause) destructive behaviors is the same way conservatives have responded to the real damage that drugs do in exacerbating destructive behaviors – with the impulse for prohibition, enforced by the law and its armed agents, the police. Quick, pass a law! Call the cops! has become a virtually automatic reaction of conservatives and liberals alike, according to their various tastes; it’s “the same inability to understand the fundamental nature of the problem at hand coupled with a perpetual, short-sighted faith in the inherent justness of well-meaning legislation.” (Mike King)
- See more at: http://www.thepolemicist.net/2013/01/the-rifle-on-wall-left-argument-for-gun.html#sthash.33tAWV42.vPywAvvk.dpuf

more at http://www.thepolemicist.net/2013/01/the-rifle-on-wall-left-argument-for-gun.html

my apologies if this is a re post.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
has anyone read this article? (Original Post) beergood Sep 2015 OP
I have been saying the same thing for years..nt virginia mountainman Sep 2015 #1
I've seen it ^^^ Not bad for an old socialist Eleanors38 Sep 2015 #2
going to play devils advocate beergood Sep 2015 #3
I haven't as a group, though I have met those who say they are (through the nets). Eleanors38 Sep 2015 #4

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
1. I have been saying the same thing for years..nt
Sat Sep 19, 2015, 06:06 PM
Sep 2015

Some are so blinded by there religious faith in gun control that they refuse too see anything else

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
2. I've seen it ^^^ Not bad for an old socialist
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 05:36 PM
Sep 2015


The controller/banners would have fit into his literary works. And we know on which side.

oink

beergood

(470 posts)
3. going to play devils advocate
Mon Sep 21, 2015, 06:08 PM
Sep 2015

most of the "gun controllers" have good intentions, and im in agreement with some of them. only a few are pro authoritarian.

going off topic, have any of you been in contact with the pink pistols?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»has anyone read this arti...