Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 09:28 AM Jan 2016

Assault Rifles, Flash Bang Grenades Bought for Park Rangers, Report Finds

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by krispos42 (a host of the Gun Control & RKBA group).

A supervisor at the Mojave National Preserve in California violated policy by buying fully automatic assault rifles and dozens of flash-bang grenades, according to a federal study released Thursday.

A supervisory park ranger at the immense desert park northeast of Los Angeles bought nine Colt M-4 fully automatic rifles between 2008 and 2010, and 24 grenades some years later, according to a report from the inspector general's office from the U.S. Department of the Interior.

The purchases violated park service policy, which specifies semi-automatic rifles and requires prior approval for defensive equipment, although the policy doesn't specifically mention flash-bang grenades, the report said.

The supervisor, who was not named in the report, acknowledged selecting the guns and allowing park rangers to carry them on duty for three years. They replaced aging and unreliable Vietnam-era rifles that rangers had been using on patrol, the report said.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/report-assault-weapons-improperly-bought-park-rangers-36301901
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Assault Rifles, Flash Bang Grenades Bought for Park Rangers, Report Finds (Original Post) SecularMotion Jan 2016 OP
so what gun control laws would prevent this? Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #1
Are the park bears armed? JonathanRackham Jan 2016 #2
Unreliable rifles? That's ridiculous. Keep it cleaned Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #3
government employee violates law...odd.... ileus Jan 2016 #4
Ummmm, aren't those the people you keep saying should have a monopoly of force? benEzra Jan 2016 #5
It's been three years since the rangers started carrying the M-4s. Snobblevitch Jan 2016 #6
Locking krispos42 Jan 2016 #7
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
1. so what gun control laws would prevent this?
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 09:44 AM
Jan 2016

Are you for or against this?

JonathanRackham

(1,604 posts)
2. Are the park bears armed?
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 09:45 AM
Jan 2016

Armed bears shall not be infringed!

(I love my police state. )

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
3. Unreliable rifles? That's ridiculous. Keep it cleaned
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 10:05 AM
Jan 2016

And oiled and it will reluably shoot forever.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
4. government employee violates law...odd....
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 01:38 PM
Jan 2016

benEzra

(12,148 posts)
5. Ummmm, aren't those the people you keep saying should have a monopoly of force?
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 10:18 PM
Jan 2016

Which is it?

BTW, for an ordinary citizen to possess those machineguns would have been a 10-year Federal felony. Ditto for the concussion grenades, if I read the law right.

Snobblevitch

(1,958 posts)
6. It's been three years since the rangers started carrying the M-4s.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 10:35 PM
Jan 2016

It's against the rules, but apparently it did not result in any problems.

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
7. Locking
Fri Jan 22, 2016, 01:04 PM
Jan 2016

Government agents being armed while on duty is not a 2nd Amendment issue nor one of gun-control laws. There is no self-defense issue here, nor any criminal misuse of guns. There is also no political aspect to this story.

This would best be in GD.

Regards,
Krispos42, Group Host

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Assault Rifles, Flash Ban...