Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sarisataka

(18,482 posts)
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 03:07 PM Jun 2016

Anti-gun director admits to felony gun purchase


Under the Gun director Stephanie Soechtig describes sending a producer from Colorado to Arizona where he purchased a Bushmaster and three pistols without a background check. She goes on to describe how this is legal. Unfortunately her legal knowledge is lacking.

First they violated 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(3)- Willful receipt of firearm from out of state by unlicensed person, carrying a penalty of up to 5 years in prison. Also since they planned this action, it would be defined as conspiracy under 18 U.S. Code § 371, giving an additional potential 5 year penalty.

Depending on the actual transaction (such as did he identify himself as non-Arizona resident) there may be additional charges of fraud, illegal transfer/transport of weapons, conspiracy and inducement to commit crime.

The current whereabouts of the four firearms was not revealed.

Should Ms Soechtig and the unnamed producer be charged with Federal felonies or excused?
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anti-gun director admits to felony gun purchase (Original Post) sarisataka Jun 2016 OP
It's for the greater good.... ileus Jun 2016 #1
This is why Universal Background Checks are needed on all sales and transactions. SecularMotion Jun 2016 #2
I agree sarisataka Jun 2016 #3
If a felony was in fact committed, would you support prosecution? Marengo Jun 2016 #7
Do you support the current Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #14
...And the hits just keep on coming! Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #4
"Should Ms. Soechtig and...producer be charged?" Moot. They are elites using diff. apps. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #5
ROFL. beevul Jun 2016 #6
Just more proof.. virginia mountainman Jun 2016 #8
The law as the elite see it is enforced... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #12
i bet the racist nra beergood Jun 2016 #15
I support prosecution and maximum sentencing. Kang Colby Jun 2016 #9
10 years mandatory for each count I believe.... virginia mountainman Jun 2016 #10
Thank goodness... beevul Jun 2016 #11
NRA has picked up the story and is running with it...as well as a number of sites. n/t Kang Colby Jun 2016 #13
Hahaha! Puha Ekapi Jun 2016 #17
Yup. Puha Ekapi Jun 2016 #16
Me three. NT pablo_marmol Jun 2016 #18

sarisataka

(18,482 posts)
3. I agree
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 03:20 PM
Jun 2016

and have supported UBCs for a long time.

Do you have a comment on the commission of the felonies or the false statement that what the director and producer did was legal?

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,475 posts)
12. The law as the elite see it is enforced...
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 08:15 PM
Jun 2016

...as applying only to those wouldn't be able to adequately defend themselves if brought to trial.
If a connected person or celebrity breaks certain laws, there will be no charges.
If you're single mom with not much money, you stand a good chance of being completely screwed.

(Ray Rice/Shaneen Allen)

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
10. 10 years mandatory for each count I believe....
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 06:33 PM
Jun 2016
It's really funny when anti-gunners believe their own propaganda about their being "no gun control laws"..

Only find out that they have committed a major felony later...

Insert 10 second pause here "for the audience too think"..
 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
11. Thank goodness...
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 07:12 PM
Jun 2016

Thank goodness I wasn't drinking when I read this:


Insert 10 second pause here "for the audience too think"..



Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Anti-gun director admits ...