Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 05:18 PM Feb 2017

New Hampshire lawmakers approve permitless conceal carry bill

http://www.jurist.org/paperchase/2017/02/new-hampshire-lawmakers-approve-permitless-conceal-carry-bill.php

[JURIST] The New Hampshire House of Representatives [official website] on Thursday approved a bill [SB 12 text] that would repeal the law prohibiting state citizens from carrying concealed firearms without a permit. Though similar bills have passed [NRA-ILA report] through the New Hampshire legislature twice, they were vetoed by the former governor, Senator Chuck Morse [official profile], on both occasions. The bill, backed by the National Rife Association (NRA) [advocacy website], would make New Hampshire the twelfth state to allow the concealed carrying of firearms, joining New England states Maine and Vermont. The bill, which passed with a 200-97 vote, must now be reviewed by Governor Christopher Sununu [official website], who is expected to sign it into law.


I'm not sure how I feel about not requiring a permit.
How do you folks feel?
12 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
The no permit option is the way to go
7 (58%)
The permit should be required and should be "shall issue"
5 (42%)
A discretionary "may issue" system is best
0 (0%)
No one ever needs to carry concealed
0 (0%)
Achtung! Ve vill tell you ven you need a gun!
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Hampshire lawmakers approve permitless conceal carry bill (Original Post) discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2017 OP
Live free AND die? n/t rzemanfl Feb 2017 #1
I notice you don't like any of the options discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2017 #5
I'm torn between the right to waste any bused in voters from Massachusetts and rzemanfl Feb 2017 #6
So you believe that not requiring a permit will lead to... discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2017 #7
No, I think more children will find unsecured guns. More spouses will be shot rzemanfl Feb 2017 #8
Is that sort of stuff going on... discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2017 #9
Well, if you want to collect statistics about 3 year-olds shooting themselves rzemanfl Feb 2017 #10
This is what wingnuts don't understand about Obamacare. Turbineguy Feb 2017 #2
I am somewhat ambivalent. pablo_marmol Feb 2017 #3
25% of states are now constitutional carry. Kang Colby Feb 2017 #4

rzemanfl

(29,556 posts)
6. I'm torn between the right to waste any bused in voters from Massachusetts and
Sun Feb 12, 2017, 12:51 PM
Feb 2017

the little children who will shoot themselves and other with guns they find.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
7. So you believe that not requiring a permit will lead to...
Sun Feb 12, 2017, 01:59 PM
Feb 2017

...children finding more unsecured guns. Is that right?

rzemanfl

(29,556 posts)
8. No, I think more children will find unsecured guns. More spouses will be shot
Sun Feb 12, 2017, 02:09 PM
Feb 2017

in the heat of the moment because a gun was handy and all the other stuff that a wild west system enables. Guns are for hunting and target shooting, not companions to one's cell phone, keys and pocket comb.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
9. Is that sort of stuff going on...
Sun Feb 12, 2017, 05:09 PM
Feb 2017

...next door in Vermont where they've had the same law?
Is NH that different from VT?

rzemanfl

(29,556 posts)
10. Well, if you want to collect statistics about 3 year-olds shooting themselves
Sun Feb 12, 2017, 06:55 PM
Feb 2017

in the head with guns they happened upon to prove your point, be my guest. I'd rather no three year-olds got shot in the head because they happened upon a loaded weapon. If there were no loaded handguns in homes that would be the case in both states. Maybe spouses would be beaten or stabbed to death rather than shot and bar fights with beer bottles or pool cues would replace shootings in exactly equal numbers. I doubt it.

Turbineguy

(37,320 posts)
2. This is what wingnuts don't understand about Obamacare.
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 05:27 PM
Feb 2017

When I went on Obamacare I saved enough money to buy a new handgun every month. In the process, I made my home a happier, healthier and safer place.

But now that I am a highly paid protestor, I make too much money to qualify for Obamacare. But at least I can enjoy picking out new teak planking for the boathouse on my private island.

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)
3. I am somewhat ambivalent.
Sat Feb 11, 2017, 06:11 PM
Feb 2017

Last edited Mon Feb 13, 2017, 01:26 AM - Edit history (1)

On the one hand, I believe that demonstration of some baseline skill level should be required for the protection of citizens in the event of a defensive gun use. On the other hand, the added expense of such training could be a de-facto ban for the poor who need protection most........as they live in dangerous, drug-infested areas. Cost of gun + safe + training could be a deal-breaker for some. I voted no permit -- which is consistent with my belief that society has an obligation to protect the vulnerable. This would include women, gays, the elderly and handicapped.

 

Kang Colby

(1,941 posts)
4. 25% of states are now constitutional carry.
Sun Feb 12, 2017, 11:23 AM
Feb 2017

Was this the tipping point? LOL


You shouldn't need a permit to excercise a constitutionally protected right.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»New Hampshire lawmakers a...