Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Agree? Disagree? Indifferent? (Original Post) gejohnston Jul 2017 OP
Agree Alea Jul 2017 #1
Agree with both vids. That gun safe is relatively new. pablo_marmol Jul 2017 #2
A right is right, how simple is that? discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2017 #3
Why the heck wouldn't you agree? Or at least have a level of indifference as jmg257 Jul 2017 #4
I have no problem with honest and responsible people who legally own ... spin Jul 2017 #5

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)
2. Agree with both vids. That gun safe is relatively new.
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 02:45 AM
Jul 2017

I've been following the YM for some time now, and agree with nearly all of his positions......though he seems to be excruciatingly naive w/regard to the menace of Dolt 45.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,476 posts)
3. A right is right, how simple is that?
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 08:53 AM
Jul 2017
Amendment 14
Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws./div]

I remember reading about a case where the government passed laws that deprived folks of basic rights. I read that the laws were denounced and a major restructuring of laws and government followed. I also read that many people killed those sent to enforce those laws. I don't advocate violence but I have learned that mistakes repeated often bring about the same consequences. Our executive branches (federal, state and local) need to exercise better judgement in these matters. Those laws I read about are known as the Intolerable Acts. They were passed in the 1760s and 1770s.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
4. Why the heck wouldn't you agree? Or at least have a level of indifference as
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 09:18 AM
Jul 2017

with other people who legally should be able to own guns.

Didn't think this was an issue.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Agree? Disagree? Indiffe...