Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumCustomer at Internet cafe shoots 2 robbers (Video)
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=428_1342491285http://www.news4jax.com/news/Internet-cafe-patron-shoots-robbery-suspects/-/475880/15570742/-/irc1tyz/-/index.html
Officials said one of the patrons, Samuel Williams, drew his own handgun and shot at the robbers, according to sheriff's officials.
Both robbers began running toward the front door, and the patron fired several more shots as they fled.
..............
They said the robbers one with a gun and the other with what looked like a bat wrapped in white tape entered from the parking lot.
The robber with the bat smashed one of the computers, the couple said. Then the robbers ordered everybody to get down on the ground and take out their wallets and whatever valuables they had.
Williams who declined to be interviewed was sitting in the row nearest the door. He immediately took out his handgun, took aim and started firing, witnesses said.
http://www.ocala.com/article/20120716/ARTICLES/120719790/0/sports
Shooting at Palms Internet Cafe
Based on what I have seen and what I know at this time, I dont anticipate filing any charges, said Bill Gladson of the State Attorneys Office
Thoughts?
permatex
(1,299 posts)and, apparently, the DA thinks the same thing.
Bottom line, don't want to get shot committing crimes? Don't commit crimes. Seems pretty simple to me.
Thanks for posting this video.
Kablooie
(18,612 posts)permatex
(1,299 posts)DonP
(6,185 posts)I missed the part where the citizen acted like a cowboy, shot several innocent bystanders, then had the gun taken away from him by the criminal and was shot with his own gun, and/or was shot by the police when they responded.
I've been assured that always happens
You must have edited that, right?
permatex
(1,299 posts)I missed that part also, damn, it had to have been edited, because we all know that concealed carry doesn't save lives as has been told to us time and time again.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)We'll be waiting.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Clames
(2,038 posts)www.google.com
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)"
I missed the part where the citizen acted like a cowboy, shot several innocent bystanders, then had the gun taken away from him by the criminal and was shot with his own gun, and/or was shot by the police when they responded.
I've been assured that always happens
You picked up the ball. Now, would you care to show us all a link that backs it up?
permatex
(1,299 posts)I've only been here a short time and even I know he's said shit like that. You've seen him accuse many of us here of saying and believing things which are totally untrue and when asked to provide proof or links to his claims, he accuses us some more instead of providing the proof.
You know this and yet you refuse to believe it. Here's one:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/117250652#post77
Oh look, here's another one:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/117250652#post127
And of course, this little gem I found where he encourages the detaining of legal CCP'ers until police arrive to "check their papers"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=118&topic_id=471849#471995
There you go, and it took me all of 1 minute to find these little gems.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Let me remind you once again what you are supposed to be supporting
"I missed the part where the citizen acted like a cowboy, shot several innocent bystanders, then had the gun taken away from him by the criminal and was shot with his own gun, and/or was shot by the police when they responded.
I've been assured that always happens
Was it just the word cowboy? Or was there something else you think you heard Hoyt say?
permatex
(1,299 posts)He's said it before. Notice you didn't say anything about his encouraging the violation of civil rights of concealed carriers. Instead, you just sloughed off his constant lies and insults but go after those of us who do carry.
I am a free thinker just as much as you are.
I provided links to some of the crap he has posted, you find the rest if you want to, its out there.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)None of those posts comes close to the claim made by DonP
Show me where Hoyt says anything to substantiate the following. It is customary to back up claims.
"I missed the part where the citizen acted like a cowboy, shot several innocent bystanders, then had the gun taken away from him by the criminal and was shot with his own gun, and/or was shot by the police when they responded.
I've been assured that always happens"
I'm not sloughing off anything, nor am I taking a side here. I'm pointing out a claim which has no substance. You continue to back that claim by pointing out other, totally irrelevant posts. By doing so, you just become part of the rabble and lose credibility. The irony is that you are now presenting yourself as another parrot of the "over my dead body" crowd of carriers.
BTW, civil rights don't require permits.
permatex
(1,299 posts)despite what you say. The comments by him are there, I've seen them.
Think what you want, but I've never seen you chastise him for his wild accusations, just us.
I don't parrot anyone, I am my self whether you want to aknowledge it or not.
BTW, you still dodged the question about his encouraging violation of civil rights, and I'm not talking about a permit, I'm talking about being illegally physically detained as he has said should happen to carriers.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)I decide whom to chastise. I agree with him on some things and disagree on others.
I don't take issue with people being detained for carrying guns in public, as long as it is legal and not abusive by the police. The police run traffic stops and sobriety checks all the time. Why not gun checks. Nobody has any business wandering around with a loaded firearm, unless they have a damn good reason beyond "It's my right".
You have the right to carry your gun. You do not have the right not to be questioned, laughed at, mocked, ridiculed or derided for behaving in such a way. 2A does not trump 1A or any other part of the constitution.
For most of us, public safety comes before personal fear.
Now, show me one post where he encourages detaining people illegally. Enough with the smoke and mirrors.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)comment 32
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=118&topic_id=471849#471995
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)And I strongly disagree with his suggestion to "Maybe even hold them until police arrive."
I am aware that he makes some OTT comments at times, but nothing close to DonP's claim, which for some reason, others are trying to back up, while DonP himself seems to have skedaddled. The old "hit and run" scenario.
Back to your quote from Hoyt, it is not illegal to report people you think might be up to no good. Detaining them would be foolish and wrong without authority.
permatex
(1,299 posts)I posted that same quote and you pretty much blew it off. Why didn't you respond to me in the same manner?
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Sorry if I don't read every link. If you want to back something up, you need to cite what was said. A bunch of links doesn't cut it sorry. I'm not trying to be petty, but that's usually the way we do it. I actually have a life and don't want to spend time plowing through links to find a quote that could have been highlighted.
permatex
(1,299 posts)here's another cowboy reference
http://www.democraticunderground.com/117245202#post9
And another one about cowboyshttp://www.democraticunderground.com/117245202#post40
Well, whadda know, another one
http://www.democraticunderground.com/117245202#post40
And here is one more
http://www.democraticunderground.com/117245202#post86
How about this one
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x435837#435919
http://sync.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=118x356327#357527
I could go on and on and on........................
But you get the picture.
Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)There was another poster here some for quite some time who was big on saying shit and then when called on it exclaiming, in so many words, "Oh, I didn't say THAT!
I'm not playing that game again.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)I don't think we want to go back and look at some of your posts, do we? Let me know if you do. I'll be glad to supply links to some of your most outrageous statements.
Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)She would constantly say things that clearly insinuated something and then when you called her on it she would claim otherwise.
permatex
(1,299 posts)I provided the link, you obviously didn't click on it.
Yeah, you do chatise people but its usually the pro gun people.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)OK to machine gun dogs and fleeing kids.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)I'm not here to defend Hoyt or anyone else, but a little honesty and respect would be nice.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)and yes, I have a serious problem with cops having machine guns and using them on dogs and children. Hoyt said it was OK for the DUSM to machine gun Sam Weaver in the back. At no point did he denounce the act. Instead he deflected the way Randy answered Fienstien's pointless and irrelevant questions. At one point he did say that what amounted to "he deserved it because his parents homeschooled him".
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)You know well that I respect you even if we disagree on some things. However, if attacks are made about other members, they should be backed up with relevant links and quotes, not editorialized opinion pieces.
I really dislike the unsubstantiated smearing that goes on around here.
Clames
(2,038 posts)One of the first results:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/117216229#post7
It seems even back then it was a common theme with Hoyt. There are plenty more too.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)permatex
(1,299 posts)of those posts are mocking Hoyt for his references to "cowboys, strap on a gun or two, shove a gun or two down your pants, practice your quick draw in front of a mirror and then go out in public to play cowboy".
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Nothing close to anything claimed by our friend DonP. Hoyt's prose is rich at times, but nothing like the "blood in the streets" inferred by DonP, PavePusher and now you, who have apparently decided to link up with some of our more vociferous advocates of carrying concealed guns upon their person. Way to go there. Thought for a moment you might be a free thinker. Oh well.
permatex
(1,299 posts)I thought the same thing also.
DonP
(6,185 posts)I just made it up out of whole cloth.
Losing miserably for a decade on every front really seems to make you gun control people frustrated and cranky?
I'm just trying to decide if you are just "playing dumb" and working on being condescending and supercilious? Or if you are actually living the part?
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)DonP
(6,185 posts)... based on the majority of your comments, pretending to be a middle of the road on the issues, but always coming down on the side of more government control, everyone knows where you stand.
But every honest person here has heard exactly those words used again and again, mainly by the same 4 or 5 losers.
But in the future I'm sure we'll all be happy to call your attention to every single asinine comment that comes out of the electronic mouth of the inane gun grabbers that inhabit these regions.
Oh, and barrels aren't full or empty, that's the chamber you are trying to use as a poorly phrased metaphor.
permatex
(1,299 posts)only took me all of 1 minute, wonder why he can't seem to find them?
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Tejas
(4,759 posts)Tejas
(4,759 posts)Florida gun stores will be full of white guys arming up."
*Above is obviously sarcasm, just saving a certain racist the trouble of posting the race card.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)He did not hesitate. He took an aggressive stance, pursued, aimed his weapon, and fired until the threat was ended.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)I he had been armed with a .45 JHPs, a shot into each side of the butt would have left the guy in a wheelchair the rest of his life, or dead.
DonP
(6,185 posts)Maybe a Bersa or similar? A little too big for a KelTec P3 or Ruger LCP.
But they always say; better a .380/.32/.22 in your pocket than a .45 in the drawer at home.
virginia mountainman
(5,046 posts)A very compact .45 that I can hide behind my very average sized wallet...
Here is a photo of one, not mine, showing how small it is.
If I must use a gun, It MUST be of effective caliber, IMHO a .380 is a "experts" weapon. I like a "margin for error" so to speak.
I am able to pocket carry a Glock 36 in my right front pocket, right beind my wallet and smart phone. In my left front pocket I carry my car keys, and two spare magazines. I can carry it all day long, without trouble.I can even carry it in my "summer" Khaki Shorts with a tucked in T-Shirt and no one has any idea that I am well armed, with a relativity powerful handgun. Causes no problems getting in and out of cars, nor are restaurant booths an issue.
Best of all, no one in the room, restaurant, street, store, park, car, beach, trail, or any other location where it is legal to be carried, only close friends, and family know about it.
EDIT, I can even carry it that way in a suit, or blue jeans, or even in a pinch, knit shorts, sweat pants or sweat shorts for that quick run out to the store for something needed in hurry.
ileus
(15,396 posts)didn't have a 36 to compare it to, but the XDS was a nice looking and feeling firearm. I have a friend that has a 36 for his EDC but I've never got to shoot it.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Although I have not favored conceal carry prior to seeing the posted video in the OP, I agree with your assessment regarding a .45 versus a .380. I'm now in the market for a concealable .45 and have a S&W 625 JM for home defense. It never jams, but it is something that is obviously too big for conceal carry.
While looking for more information regarding the Glock 36 that you mention, I ran across a web site. You might want to check it out. From the video that he posted regarding a problem with the Glock 36 that he now considers to be a relatively common problem that other Glock 36 owners have had, it's clear that he is an experienced shooter and he has a proper grip on his Glock 36 when firing it. He has information which you might want to be aware of.
http://g36mf.blogspot.com/
Clames
(2,038 posts)And with the resurgence of light weight CCW pistols tailored for the round there has been renewed interest in developing self-defense loads for it. Stopping power is a myth. Large bore or small bore the only metric that counts is shot placement. That is what determines how effective a particular type of round will be.
sarisataka
(18,498 posts)location, location, location.
A miss by a .45 is as good as a miss by a .22. A hit will, obviously, have different results.
Clames
(2,038 posts)....would have different results on a slim-build person who is stone sober. I've seen incidences where a person took rifle fire and should have died on the spot but managed to keep going through sheer force of will. Another dies from a single small caliber pistol shot like somebody turned out the lights. Too many variables to make generalizations with respect to caliber.
sarisataka
(18,498 posts)each person is unique and even different day to day.
I am happy with .38 these days and always practice failure to stop drill.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)such as a head or spine fit.
Clames
(2,038 posts)Some people just keep going. Even if you fired a shot that destroyed the heart there is still enough oxygen in the blood to keep the attacker going for several minutes. That is an eternity in such a situation.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)projectile, the target is going to stop. This means head, spine, pr femur.
Clames
(2,038 posts)Sniper's are trained to aim for a "T" that covers the eyes and center of the face. A shot in that zone will instantly sever the brain and essentially "turn out the lights" on an attacker. Not an easy zone to hit and doesn't work as well with popular pistol calibers. If you hit the spine you might paralyze the attacker but it is seldom instant (a recent video was posted here where a robber was shot in the lower spine and was still able to scramble away before paralysis set in) and the femur is a tough bone even against .45 ACP.
Kablooie
(18,612 posts)Not as powerful as your Glock but formidable if you fill it with really stinky water.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)For them your stinky water would be an improvement.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)but over-all, very well done. He made sure he had clear lanes of fire, hit moving targets 3 times (looks like 5 or 6 shots fired, hard to tell for sure from the silent video), for a hit rate of approx. 50%.
Well done, Citizen!
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)sarisataka
(18,498 posts)from robbers come in to last shot fired. These things happen very fast.
My main criticism would be the last shot fired out the door could be seen as excessive by an overzealous prosecutor. OTH if the robber appeared to be turning to fire a shot, remember nobody could tell the gun didn't work, it would be entirely justified.
virginia mountainman
(5,046 posts)Was the suspect STILL ARMED????? If so, he was still a lethal threat, even running away, he could turn and shoot at any time.
Running away is not "surrender" the threat for things to go really bad is still their. Running OUTSIDE the building and continuing to fire could have been considered excessive.
Like you pointed out, it all happened in 19 seconds.
sarisataka
(18,498 posts)the shot was reckless. I just envision a DA with a serious anti-gun agenda giving it a try.
Like you point out, they are still armed and have shown that they are violent. That in itself could justify attempting to stop them while fleeing.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)I was assured by another anti-gun poster that people don't wear hoodies in hot weather.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,315 posts)Score one for the good guys.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Last edited Tue Jul 17, 2012, 09:55 PM - Edit history (1)
You think shooting people is a game with "good guys" and "bad guys"? You think it's about keeping score?
Do your parents know you're hanging out on the internet? Oh, right, your dad's in Florida "busting caps in asses". What's mom doing? Maintaining the integrity of your SN?
Clames
(2,038 posts)Should be "score two for the good guys".
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)DonP
(6,185 posts)Or are you taking over the now vacant position of criminal apologist from our prior resident Canadian?
I'll make it simple, so even you and all your gun control friends can grasp the concept.
Bad guys are the ones that run into the store, smashed some computers, ordered a bunch of innocent people to the ground and to produce their wallets under threat of death or severe physical injury (That's what the bad guys gun and baseball bat were for)
The good guy was the one that responded and shot one in the ass twice and the other once, didn't injure anyone but the criminals, and sadly, deprived the criminals of a lot of free stuff and gun grabbers of being able to point to a bunch of innocent civilians injured by "a rude toter with a gun stuffed down his pants".
That should help you and others with obvious cognitive impairments.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,315 posts)We are probably MOSTLY on the same side in these debates.
I found it a bit humorous the old codger who looks like my, now deceased, father who never owned a gun putting a few pills in those assholes. Besides, no one was killed or sustained life threatening injuries.
And for the mother crack: Go fuck yourself.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)brave. but, Mothers are always worth taking a chance on a hidden post. I wonder if it was alerted and allowed to stand.
permatex
(1,299 posts)Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)BTW the pic is starting to get old.
ileus
(15,396 posts)He doesn't trust proxies at his home where he's monitored because he's on the watch list.
please? My sides are hurting
shadowrider
(4,941 posts)He should have attempted to disarm the guys using his shoe as a weapon. At 80 years old I'm sure it would have been no problem.
Tejas
(4,759 posts)Some female poster said firearms were for cowards and that she used one to thwart a home invasion by 3 disadvantaged individuals. She was a real firecracker.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Your posted video has convinced me.
It's also good to see that the guy had some practice. It looks like 6 rounds fired at moving targets with three hits. Not bad.
TPaine7
(4,286 posts)*wipes away tear*
Marinedem
(373 posts)Someone pin a medal on that guy!
Well done old dude. Well done.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)PavePusher
(15,374 posts)I'm in my 40's and I'm old to some, young to others.
Perspective is a variable.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)Fembot
(4 posts)Shooter did not try reason with these misunderstood youths.
The Hoodies are a cultural thing you crackers wouldn't understand.
They were probably wearing hoodies in solidarity with Trayvon.
This old dude should have just dropped to his knee's and begged for mercy, they probably would not have killed him.
Welcome to DU.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)permatex
(1,299 posts)now I'll say goodbye to a racist troll
Kablooie
(18,612 posts)Loudly
(2,436 posts)The story would have been more persuasive with just the bat.
But one of the robbers had a gun which emboldened this crime.
Zero points.
permatex
(1,299 posts)sarisataka
(18,498 posts)Tejas
(4,759 posts)Too many youths buying into MTV and hype from ex-cons.
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)Some lethal weapons are OK to use a gun against while others are not?
Tejas
(4,759 posts)"Noooooooooo, don't shoot, you can plainly see it's just a rusty old gun that doesn't work. My finger isn't even on the trigger! I'M INNOCENT!!1!"