Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 12:06 AM Jul 2012

Homeowner upset about bus ad

Here is an example of what we talk about all the time. This woman is obviously anti-gun and she doesn't like it because there is an ad for a gun store on a city bus. She spouts off about crime rates and makes a couple of other interesting comments. Bottom line here. Like most anti-gunners she has no idea what she is talking about.

Oh yea lady, criminals had no idea where to get guns until this ad came out....

O’Connor says, “We live in a community that has struggled with a high crime rate, it's going down now but it's still high. We live in a community that's suffered economically. That creates crime problems and it does not seem at all appropriate for a bus to be running an ad telling people explicitly where they can purchase weapons."


I am not sure what the connection is between gun ads and the financial hardship of the community but apparently in her feeble little anti-gun mind there is a connection. I suppose that is the way it is with the anti's, everything is connected to guns in one way or another.

http://www.whec.com/news/stories/S2693250.shtml?cat=565


***MORE AT THE LINK***
41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Homeowner upset about bus ad (Original Post) Meiko Jul 2012 OP
She really needs to get a clue. What a moronic idiot. permatex Jul 2012 #1
Yeah, pretty much. Marinedem Jul 2012 #2
Another "all guns kill people" true beliver ileus Jul 2012 #3
I call them "TaliBanners" Common Sense Party Jul 2012 #4
Weeding out guns ain't "fundie , " gun culture is. Hoyt Jul 2012 #14
100% wrong, once again. Common Sense Party Jul 2012 #21
He will happily defend to the death your right to agree with him. So there's that... friendly_iconoclast Jul 2012 #22
I'm sure your dreamed-of Prohibition 3.0 would work just as well wiping out guns... friendly_iconoclast Jul 2012 #23
Radical anti-gun types 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #33
They should have strict gun laws limiting the sale of firearms 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #5
Admins upset about the OP. LOL Hassin Bin Sober Jul 2012 #6
I think she knows what she's talking about. Just because she doesn't have 50 weapons at home Hoyt Jul 2012 #7
What leads you to believe that her quote ManiacJoe Jul 2012 #8
This is my message to her. permatex Jul 2012 #9
I get it, you two are about 14 years old. Hoyt Jul 2012 #10
64 and enjoying my hard earned retirement permatex Jul 2012 #13
Woman in OP = 3yr old that saw a spider. Tejas Jul 2012 #34
Not understanding the First Amendment means she hasn't got a valid and knowledgeable opinion. friendly_iconoclast Jul 2012 #11
Doesn't matter - lots of folks just don't like guns and their impact on society. Hoyt Jul 2012 #12
Doesn't matter-lots of folks just don't like the idea of same sex marriage and the impact on society permatex Jul 2012 #15
We are not talking about any of that. Should people be allowed to carry a grenade in public? Hoyt Jul 2012 #18
Guns are used to intimidate permatex Jul 2012 #19
I can see why you carry those -- looks like a pair of gonads. Hoyt Jul 2012 #20
Still looking in other peoples pants? PavePusher Jul 2012 #38
I don't like busybodies and their impact on society 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #17
Lots of folks don't like guns because of the propaganda war. Remmah2 Jul 2012 #24
"Propaganda war?" You mean like guns are good, guns are great -- more guns in more places . . . . . Hoyt Jul 2012 #25
There ya go again. Remmah2 Jul 2012 #29
The guns she owns or doesn't own have no bearing on the validity of her opinion 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #16
Naw, the gun culture believes if you aren't familiar with gun nomenclature, you can't express Hoyt Jul 2012 #26
When they utter shit like permatex Jul 2012 #27
So, in your world you have to be a gun nut to express an opinion on gun laws. Hoyt Jul 2012 #28
Thats not what I said and you well know it. permatex Jul 2012 #30
Permatex, I don't seek credibility among those who have to strap a gun on to venture outside. Hoyt Jul 2012 #36
Well, thats good because you have accomplished permatex Jul 2012 #39
If your position is one based on pride in your ignorance 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #32
What would you like to know about guns? Hoyt Jul 2012 #35
Huh? 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #37
You couldn't teach or educate anyone, anything about guns. permatex Jul 2012 #41
Gun nomenclature? 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #31
That's an outright fabrication. PavePusher Jul 2012 #40

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
4. I call them "TaliBanners"
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 11:38 AM
Jul 2012

They're fundie extremists who like to take away others' rights in order to form a more "pure" society.

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
23. I'm sure your dreamed-of Prohibition 3.0 would work just as well wiping out guns...
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 01:08 AM
Jul 2012

...as the first two did wiping out alcohol and drugs.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
33. Radical anti-gun types
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 11:54 AM
Jul 2012

wish to push their views on everyone else via policies decisions based on their feelings rather than evidence and seem to take an overwhelming pride in their complete ignorance about what they are discussing.

Fundamentally no different than people who insist we teach creationism in school.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
5. They should have strict gun laws limiting the sale of firearms
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 12:16 PM
Jul 2012

then they can be as safe and crime free as Detroit and Washington DC.

Wyoming has the highest rate of gun ownership and we all know what a dystopian nightmare that state has become.

/all sarcasm aside I do feel bad for her, being forced at gun-point (heh) to go to this store and purchase a gun against her will which will then use it's magic mind controlling powers to force her to kill someone she loves. That's rough.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
7. I think she knows what she's talking about. Just because she doesn't have 50 weapons at home
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 08:44 PM
Jul 2012

and two strapped to her body, doesn't mean she hasn't got a valid and knowledgeable opinion.

 

Tejas

(4,759 posts)
34. Woman in OP = 3yr old that saw a spider.
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 11:57 AM
Jul 2012

Hoyt

10. I get it, you two are about 14 years old.

(cue the 'lighten up Francis')

Thank goodness the hysterical woman in the article is not the norm.

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
11. Not understanding the First Amendment means she hasn't got a valid and knowledgeable opinion.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 10:12 PM
Jul 2012

And she's not exactly up on "cause and effect", either...

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
15. Doesn't matter-lots of folks just don't like the idea of same sex marriage and the impact on society
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 10:31 PM
Jul 2012

See how fucking stupid that sounds? (admins, just to be clear, I do support gay marriage/rights).
Rights aren't contingent on what other people think of their impact on society.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
18. We are not talking about any of that. Should people be allowed to carry a grenade in public?
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 11:06 PM
Jul 2012

How about a crossbow, war axe, or whatever?

Guns are Not like real Civil Rights. In fact, guns are used to intimidate.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
19. Guns are used to intimidate
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 11:13 PM
Jul 2012

POS dirtbag thugs.
I carry a WW2 style grenade in my car, of course it's inert but I do get looks.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
38. Still looking in other peoples pants?
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 12:13 PM
Jul 2012

Most people outgrow that by the age of five, unless they are specifically invited.

The rest... well there are various names and diagnoses for that.

 

Remmah2

(3,291 posts)
24. Lots of folks don't like guns because of the propaganda war.
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 09:20 AM
Jul 2012

She was obviously offended probably due to misinformation.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
25. "Propaganda war?" You mean like guns are good, guns are great -- more guns in more places . . . . .
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 09:44 AM
Jul 2012
 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
16. The guns she owns or doesn't own have no bearing on the validity of her opinion
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 10:35 PM
Jul 2012

the fact that it's stupid does.

/I saw something that offended me once. I . . . got over it.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
26. Naw, the gun culture believes if you aren't familiar with gun nomenclature, you can't express
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 09:47 AM
Jul 2012

opinion on people running around in public with the dang things and other gun expansionist topics important to our society.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
27. When they utter shit like
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 09:59 AM
Jul 2012

heat seeking bullets, shoulder thing that goes up, cop killer bullets, then why should they be taken seriously? If your not educated on the item your trying to restrict or ban, then your an idiot that needs schooling.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
28. So, in your world you have to be a gun nut to express an opinion on gun laws.
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 10:32 AM
Jul 2012

Sounds like the right wingers who want people to pass an intelligence test or have a job before they can vote.

I think most people understand guns well enough to know whether they want just any yahoo walking around in public with one because the toter is afraid of people; think they are too weak defend themselves without a gun; think they are too weak to intimidate people anymore without a gun; think they are a law enforcement supplement; think Stand Your Ground is good; and worse.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
30. Thats not what I said and you well know it.
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 11:11 AM
Jul 2012

If you want to debate from a position of strength, then learn WTF your debating about.
Your a perfect example of what I posted, you argue from a position of ignorance, you post lies and misrepresentations, you encourage the violation of rights, you never post links to your ridiculous accusations and when cornered, you scream racist, RW gun toters, yahoos, you just did it.
What really amazes me is that you actually think you have some credibility here and that people actually believe what you post.
If you dislike gun owners so much, why are you even here? I'm not telling you to leave, I just wonder why someone who holds those of us who CHOOSE to legally own and carry firearms in such disdain would even want to be here, unless it's to disrupt the group.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
36. Permatex, I don't seek credibility among those who have to strap a gun on to venture outside.
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 12:08 PM
Jul 2012
 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
39. Well, thats good because you have accomplished
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 12:15 PM
Jul 2012

what you set out to do, no credibility at all. So new members to this group can look at this post and dismiss anything you have to say out of hand.
Thanks for the admission.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
37. Huh?
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 12:10 PM
Jul 2012

You should check and see if you responded to the right person.

Given the context your reply makes as much sense as a silencer on a revolver. Or the term "assault weapon".

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
31. Gun nomenclature?
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 11:36 AM
Jul 2012

No she's not wrong because she doesn't know what a barrel shroud is.

She's wrong because she links an ad on a bus to the poor economy and crime (which even she says is getting better).

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
40. That's an outright fabrication.
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 12:16 PM
Jul 2012

You can express any ridiculous opinion you want.....

Just don't cry when it gets exposed as a lie, distortion, ignorance or blatent stupidity.

Want a hanky?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Homeowner upset about bus...