I have a proposal.....

[Logical]

FIRE any journalist who talks about automatic weapons during a shooting when no automatic weapon was present.

Wow, are people clueless about just the basic facts of a story.

[permatex]

1. I agree

[tularetom]

2. Yep, time to trot out this ol' standby

[Logical]

3. +1 good one!

[OriginalGeek]

4. lol, my boss has that Nerf gun

in his office...



we behave.

[guardian]

5. Agreed

I was watching MSNBC today (Melissa Harris-Perry) and all of her guest knew ZERO about firearms. One of the guests was talking about how the James Holmes had a "magazine that held a 100 clips". These people are embarrassing themselves every time they speak about firearms.

Most of the guests looked like they'd cry and wet themselves if they ever touched a firearm.

[discntnt_irny_srcsm]

6. Why is such incompetence...

...tolerated? It wouldn't be in any of the places I've worked.

[shadowrider]

7. Incompetence is not only tolerated but it's a resume enhancer if you're anti-gun n/t

[discntnt_irny_srcsm]

9. But why? n/t

[shadowrider]

12. The furtherance of the anti-gun agenda must be accomplished by any means necessary

the media leading the charge.

[discntnt_irny_srcsm]

13. That's like saying...

...because I said so. Leave it to the controllers to minimize sense and reason.

[shadowrider]

14. Now you're getting it n/t

[rl6214]

10. Because anyone that is willing to even touch a gun is just a "gun nut".

[discntnt_irny_srcsm]

11. So it's just being...

...a conformist that justifies incompetence? Unbelievable!

[rl6214]

8. "are people clueless about just the basic facts of a story"

YES

[Jenoch]

15. I agree,

it is also annoying that law enforcement and media keep referring to the 'assault rifle' used in this terrible shooting.
The AR-15, of course, is not an assault rifle.