Sun Sep 2, 2012, 11:24 PM
rDigital (2,239 posts)
Home intruders get more than they bargain for in Atlanta
http://www.ajc.com/news/news/local/home-intruders-get-more-than-they-bargain-for-in-a/nR2Sd/
This is pretty sad, one of the assailants even shot the homeowner's dog. I'm sure there are those who would be happy to see this homeowner disarmed, helpless & depending on the police to protect his life. However, that's not the case. Mr. Robbins decided to take an active role in the defense of his person. He wasn't carrying on his person, but he made sure that his firearm was accessible to him in an emergency such as the one that he encountered. Maybe, he will think about getting a concealed carry license and carrying on his person. He got lucky this time and hopefully there never is a next time.
|
21 replies, 3663 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
rDigital | Sep 2012 | OP |
Loudly | Sep 2012 | #1 | |
holdencaufield | Sep 2012 | #2 | |
Loudly | Sep 2012 | #3 | |
holdencaufield | Sep 2012 | #4 | |
Loudly | Sep 2012 | #7 | |
rDigital | Sep 2012 | #8 | |
Loudly | Sep 2012 | #12 | |
rDigital | Sep 2012 | #14 | |
Clames | Sep 2012 | #20 | |
holdencaufield | Sep 2012 | #13 | |
ileus | Sep 2012 | #11 | |
ProgressiveProfessor | Sep 2012 | #9 | |
Missycim | Sep 2012 | #21 | |
rDigital | Sep 2012 | #6 | |
Loudly | Sep 2012 | #10 | |
rDigital | Sep 2012 | #15 | |
holdencaufield | Sep 2012 | #16 | |
Loudly | Sep 2012 | #17 | |
rDigital | Sep 2012 | #18 | |
Loudly | Sep 2012 | #19 | |
ileus | Sep 2012 | #5 |
Response to rDigital (Original post)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 11:34 PM
Loudly (2,436 posts)
1. The assailants were armed with at least one gun.
This is a guns-as-solutions-to-guns story.
Zero points awarded. |
Response to Loudly (Reply #1)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 11:38 PM
holdencaufield (2,927 posts)
2. Not sure I understand your point?
This is -- as I understand it -- a LEGAL use of guns as a solution to the ILLEGAL use of guns story, don't you agree?
Reinstatement of House Points. |
Response to holdencaufield (Reply #2)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 11:44 PM
Loudly (2,436 posts)
3. The story was posted to highlight the need for homeowners to have guns.
To, in effect, glorify the homeowner's gun as a wonderful thing.
But the need for the homeowner to have a gun results from the public's access to guns as evidenced by the assailants' possession of one. So this story does not advance the argument whatsoever in favor of access to guns and ammunition. At best, it is a push. A gun being lauded as a solution to a gun. No points awarded. |
Response to Loudly (Reply #3)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 11:53 PM
holdencaufield (2,927 posts)
4. Is it your suggestion ...
... that there is a way to remove guns from those who chose to violate the law? How so, with gun laws? Have you thought this all the way through?
How do you account for the rising incidents of gun-related crimes in places like the UK or Australia (or Chicago for that matter) where guns are heavily restricted? House points restored. |
Response to holdencaufield (Reply #4)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 11:57 PM
Loudly (2,436 posts)
7. Scarcity needs to be the goal. Plain and simple.
Scarcity not proliferation.
Where does proliferation take us? |
Response to Loudly (Reply #7)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 12:00 AM
rDigital (2,239 posts)
8. What do you propose unarmed victims who find themselves
on the business end of "scarce firearms" do?
Bicycle wheel? Beans (I hear that soup works better)? |
Response to rDigital (Reply #8)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 12:04 AM
Loudly (2,436 posts)
12. Where does proliferation take us?
Can't you see five feet ahead of you?
|
Response to Loudly (Reply #12)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 12:07 AM
rDigital (2,239 posts)
14. It's OK, you don't have to answer my questions.
Response to Loudly (Reply #12)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 12:42 AM
Clames (2,038 posts)
20. Obviously not where you think it does.
Only obvious thing here is your lack of evidence to support your assertion. Typical.
|
Response to rDigital (Reply #8)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 12:04 AM
holdencaufield (2,927 posts)
13. Prayer and Fasting ...
Response to Loudly (Reply #7)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 12:04 AM
ileus (15,396 posts)
11. To the range.
With lots of options for the whole family to enjoy shooting.
|
Response to Loudly (Reply #3)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 12:01 AM
ProgressiveProfessor (22,144 posts)
9. Yo Shares...you are not even hiding it anymore
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #9)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 07:13 AM
Missycim (950 posts)
21. I know,
its almost an insult to DU to do it the way he is doing it.
|
Response to Loudly (Reply #1)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 11:56 PM
rDigital (2,239 posts)
6. Does this make you feel better?
All of these robbers were stabbed by the homeowner:
http://wcfcourier.com/news/local/fourth-person-arrested-in-alleged-waterloo-home-invasion/article_f13c3f38-f10d-11e1-ad84-0019bb2963f4.html 7:30 a.m. Wednesday - WATERLOO, Iowa --- Two Cedar Falls residents who told police they were stabbed and robbed during an early Tuesday morning scuffle have been arrested. |
Response to rDigital (Reply #6)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 12:03 AM
Loudly (2,436 posts)
10. Yeah, that's the feel good story of the year.
Response to Loudly (Reply #10)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 12:09 AM
rDigital (2,239 posts)
15. I guess we should make knives and blunt objects "scarce" too or you will never be satisfied.
I must admit. You're hard to please.
|
Response to rDigital (Reply #15)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 12:14 AM
holdencaufield (2,927 posts)
16. Drill presses and lathes ...
... can be used by any moderately skilled person to manufacture serviceable weapons. Perhaps they need to be banned as well.
Prior to the establishment of Israel -- Jews (who were prohibited by the British Administration to own firearms) created fully functional recreations of STEN Guns in secret using plumbing supplies. |
Response to rDigital (Reply #15)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 12:17 AM
Loudly (2,436 posts)
17. Seriously, that story probably deserves more than one point.
Home invasion both initiated and foiled without the use of a firearm.
If the homeowner had used a gun, it would get the single point. |
Response to Loudly (Reply #17)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 12:22 AM
rDigital (2,239 posts)
18. It would have been over quicker if the homeowner had used a can of beans.
The other suspects would have ran in terror.
That's at least 7 points by my accounting. |
Response to rDigital (Reply #18)
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 12:28 AM
Loudly (2,436 posts)
19. If the point system is confined to justifying guns, though.
There can only be one point awarded. It's a binary condition.
Either the story supports the proposition that guns belong in the hands of the public or it doesn't. This one does, since no gun was used to initiate the attack. It is not a guns-as-solution-to-guns story, which so many of them are, and which do nothing to justify gun availability. |
Response to rDigital (Original post)
Sun Sep 2, 2012, 11:54 PM
ileus (15,396 posts)
5. 3 points for successful SD use of a PSD.
Something to learn from every successful SD gun use.
|