Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumVisitor's gun discharged at St. Vincent's (hospital, FL)
http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/article/274535/423/Visitors-gun-accidentally-goes-off-at-St-VincentsJACKSONVILLE, Fla. -- St. Vincent's Hospital in Riverside was on lockdown briefly late Thursday morning after the gun of a person visiting a hospital patient was discharged.
No one was hurt by the gun's discharge and the visitor did have a concealed weapons permit, according to Ilyssa Trussel with St. Vincent's.
A Jacksonville Sheriff's Office deputy who is normally on campus got to the room quickly and the situation was contained, Trussel said.
Melissa Bujeda, Public Information Officer with JSO, said the bullet went through a wall and into the shower. No one was injured.
<more>
dumbass
yup
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)We really need to pass some "common sense" motor vehicle laws. It appears from the article that the driver of the vehicle was licensed to drive and owned the car legally.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)in places like hospitals is a great idea.
trouble.smith
(374 posts)in a manner that increased the likelihood of a negligent discharge. A gun left in its holster doesn't go off by itself. period. When people are forced to pull their guns out to comply with those pesky "thou shall not possess a weapon here" signs; however, the chances of having an accidental discharge increase.
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)The patient fired the shot, not the CCW-ing visitor.
trouble.smith
(374 posts)ellisonz
(27,711 posts)I think you mean chose to
trouble.smith
(374 posts)I didn't know there was such a choice. It doesn't apply in this case anyways.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)You're saying that this fool did not have a choice in not carrying a weapon in a dangerous manner in a hospital? BTW - toting is sadly still legal in Florida hospitals.
trouble.smith
(374 posts)Sounds like that's less of an issue in Florida than it is here in Ohio. Here in Ohio, Hospital security guards don't even carry guns from what I have seen. You can generally be confident that the only people with guns in Ohio hospitals are criminals in fact which is surprising considering the drugs you can find in even a small hospital.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Try this out: don't take your stupid gun into the hospital. See how that works out better? Nobody discharges anything except perhaps a defibrillator.
trouble.smith
(374 posts)If it were legal I would though because I don't like pulling it out of its holster and leaving it in a car in order to comply with signs because that increases the chances of an accidental discharge as well as the chances of a criminal getting their hands on a firearm. Guns don't go off in their holsters, they go off when you handle them for whatever reason which is what happened in this case; however, this person wasn't complying with any regulations, they were just being stupid. In Ohio, we reduce the incudence of unsafe dumbasses from carrying CCWs with firearms safety courses which I find to be a perfectly reasonable thing given the number of dumbasses out there. It's all very logical actually but I understand what you're implying, don't carry a gun at all and that won't happen, right?
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)speculation or are you just pulling it out of.....?
trouble.smith
(374 posts)and pulling your gun out to comply with signage is dangerous which was really my only point. Now go brush your teeth.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)don't confuse me with any facts'. I've rarely seen such forceful logic on these boards. Next time try reading the fucking article before 'speculating on the internet'.
Response to COLGATE4 (Reply #22)
Post removed
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)Response to jpak (Original post)
Post removed
ileus
(15,396 posts)so he/she was dicking with it.
OWB is the place for me....
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)A few are going to do something stupid. So what?
Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)Are you trying to insinuate that this sort of behavior is common among CCW permit holders?
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)Those carrying guns not on their person should not leave the bags where others can get into them.
petronius
(26,602 posts)involves an unattached bag to contain the firearm. Especially something that is habitually set down, like a purse...
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)Are you saying that I should not be allowed to posses firearms?
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)The article states that the hospital patient was not in a clear state of mind (suggesting he was on mind altering drugs). He took the gun out of the visitor's purse, was playing with it, and fired the shot into the wall.
That would seem to not describe your situation.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)That is what you wrote.
That is what I read.
A plain statement with no variances added.
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)I certainly did not mean to imply anything about maintenance meds.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)I get a little touchy about it.
Hoyt meant ALL people on meds, irregardless of type.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)The CCWer had the gun in her purse and left it unattended. If a person carries a gun it should always be carried on the person so it is always under their control.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)If you can't go anywhere without your little gun, then we should make it a law that if you carry in city limits, you MUST have insurance for your paranoia. Is it worth $100 a month to carry it?
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)Minneapolis Star vs. Minnesota Department of Revenue.