Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumInsecure males, not guns, are to blame
My partner's letter to the editor, recently published:
"True, the National Rifle Association is not the creator of our Second Amendment, but it is, along with the inadequate availability of mental treatment, an impediment to any meaningful legislation that could help keep guns out of the hands of the mentally unstable.
The NRA stance that the Union will collapse unless even the mentally unstable have the right to own and carry any kind of firearm anywhere they want is unsustainable.
In spite of the strains on the arms industry, a child's right to live trumps your right to own a gun without a background check.
I am not blaming guns, I am blaming insecure males that need assault rifles to bolster their manhood and let themselves be manipulated by the NRA.
The meaning of "well regulated" is the same now as it was in the 18th century: Controlled or supervised by means of rules and regulations."
http://www.alamogordonews.com/opinion/ci_22277491/insecure-males-not-guns-are-blame
You can respond via facebook, if you want. He was responding to several pro-gun ltte's and I am so proud of his letter.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)McDiggy
(150 posts)...of course, the problem here with blaming this on men is that the "insecure" person in this case happened to be a female that decided to amass a huge collection of firearms that was easily accessible by her mentally ill child. I'd reconsider the gender-blame overtones because it seems pretty silly considering what actually happened in this case.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)One we hadn't thought of.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)met my wife there.
May I make some corrections?
Bonhomme Richard
(9,000 posts)duhneece
(4,112 posts)I think it will take a wide variety of changes to decrease the odds of another tragic Columbine, Adam Lanza, Virginia Tech, etc.
Just as we decreased deaths per driven mile by improving roads (the angles at curves, the slope for water run-off, etc), steering, brakes, licensing testing, DWI laws, education, seatbelts, etc, I believe it will take a variety of laws to reduce the deaths of innocents by firearms including closing the loopholes for gun sales at gun shows, automatic weapons, increased mental health services and research, public education, to name a few changes. I think it's time we put our heads together and discuss possible changes.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)when was the last crime committed with a legal automatic weapon? IIRC, it was a cop murdering an informant with a MAC 10 registered to the police department that employed him.
BTW, most gun show sellers are FFLs, and they have to follow the same federal and local laws as their store.
Gun shows had nothing to do with any of those shootings.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)I live 100 miles north of Juarez Mexico and am aware of the many guns sold to folks that don't have to have background checks because they are sold at gun shows here in my community by non FFL's...'somehow' they end up in Mexico, contributing to death there.
I, and many (a majority) of people I talk to are opposed to automatic weapons and I am hoping we continue to speak up, speak out loud.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)cartels are using automatic weapons from Central America and other places. Certainly not from a gun show given the regulations covering them.
I didn't know automatic weapons were such a hot issue. I am opposed to cops having them, but collectors with their antiques I have no problem with.
You do know what an automatic weapon is right?
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)having automatic weapons? My brother is a cop and has an H&K MP5/40 in his squad. He has never even unlocked it to use in a tactical situation and gas only shot it on the range.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)esp SWAT teams and their over use.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)to examples of the 'militarization' of cops that you believe is happening?
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)progressive talk radio folks, esp on Pacifica. Don't see it in my neck of the woods, but here is an article. Every now and then Thom Hartmann would rant about local PDs getting free APCs and etc.
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/11/how-the-war-on-terror-has-militarized-the-police/248047/#
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)of yours? You seem to be backing off. I have not noticed the kind of SWAT activity in my area which is described in the link you provided. The interesting thing aboyt that link is that the Pima County Sheriff, Clarence Dupnik, is a liberal who wushes much tougher gun control laws in Arizona.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)When I'm in my hometown in Wyoming, more like Andy. Citrus County Florida more like Barney. It seems to me that if the cop needs range, a carbine would be better. Otherwise, I think a shotgun does a better job than a SMG.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)Here is an aside about cops and CCW permit holders. I wish I could find the link, but I read somewbere that it is statistically more likely for a LEO to be convicted of a crime than a conceal carry permit holder. I'm not sure what to make of that.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)drug bust, big stack of cash. Bust a dealer or pimp with a big roll. Just a guess. Of course there is bribery. Have to see a break down of crimes.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)I don't think any place is really well functioning. If you take just the OCED countries
we are third in murder, Mexico is first.
Australia is first in rape
Belgium is first if robberies
UK is first in violent assaults
South Korea is first in suicide
clffrdjk
(905 posts)Last edited Tue Jan 1, 2013, 01:11 PM - Edit history (1)
"True, the National Rifle Association is not the creator of our Second Amendment, but it is, along with the inadequate availability of mental treatment, an impediment to any meaningful legislation that could help keep guns out of the hands of the mentally unstable.
So do something useful and open the background check system to everyone.
The NRA stance that the Union will collapse unless even the mentally unstable have the right to own and carry any kind of firearm anywhere they want is unsustainable.
Show me where that has ever been a stance of NRA.
In spite of the strains on the arms industry, a child's right to live trumps your right to own a gun without a background check.
Back to number one
I am not blaming guns, I am blaming insecure males that need assault rifles to bolster their manhood and let themselves be manipulated by the NRA.
I don't have the time or inclination to debate liars or children, it is time to grow up.
The meaning of "well regulated" is the same now as it was in the 18th century: Controlled or supervised by means of rules and regulations."
Ok show me some new rules that DON'T INFRINGE on my rights.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)Every point Ken made is in response to recent local letters to the editor that argued against any additional regulations.
He is also very involved in local behavioral health organizations where we see programs for behavioral health being cut and is responding from that knowledge.
I think C Heston's comment to 'pry my cold, dead hands' illustrates the NRA's stance on the mentally unstable to have the right to own & carry any kind of firearm better than any mere statement could.
We are surrounded by neighbors who reveal their insecurity in many ways, the gun issue being the most pertinent one right now.
My late husband was a gunsmith and frequently discussed how he had to deal with gun nuts as well as gun enthusiasts and Ken spots the nuts every time.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)I don't think Heston's comment about mental stability as it was defiance. During the past three weeks there have been rants blaming all gun owners for Newtown. I don't buy any variation of the "penis" argument. It has more to do with people not liking being blamed for the social problems in Chicago or DC. As criminologist Jame Wright observed 20 years ago, that is the perception.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)You see it as defiance, I see it as inappropriate and so lacking in compassion as to be sick.
Again, you don't buy the 'penis' argument; I do.
I do agree with you that social problems and our response (or lack of response) to them contribute to gun deaths.
I think gun deaths are so complex that to decrease them will require changes on many fronts.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)childish and shows a lack of any cogent or thought out argument. Shallow at best, bigoted at worst.
So, you don't care about murders and suicides by other means? That reinforces my opinion that gun control is less about public safety and more about culture war.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)I believe that my comments about our need for more mental health services and research was an 'umbrella' consideration for reducing suicides, assaults, rapes, teen pregnancy, abuse, and all murders. But you might not have seen that/those comments.
The posturing of men who don't understand the strength of compassion, who consider kindness & forgiveness to be a weakness has impacted my life in so many ways that I forget that some women also have the same lacks. The greater power that men have on our society and the greater number of men who commit murders, rape and declare unnecessary wars sometimes blinds me to women's same crimes. I didn't use the penis argument, my 72 yr old male partner did, but I 'got' it at such a gut level that I didn't recognize its shallowness or bigotry. Will have to think about that.
When you said I don't care about murders & suicides by other means, I thought "that's one hell of an assumption." My late husband committed suicide in 1998 and I'm very involved in our behavioral health local collaborative.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)but generally the case. I don't think I have seen many of you posts. I usually read news OPs and the stuff I subscribe to. I rarely read comment posts for the most part.
Unnecessary wars are more about money, not machismo.
I don't think I said you personally didn't. Just when I see "the rate of gun suicides dropped" but ignore the fact that the suicide rate did not drop brings the cynic out in me. True Switzerland and the US have high gun suicides out of the OCED countries, but South Korea has three times the suicide rate.
To change the subject, there used to be a nice restaurant at 10th and White Sands called the Cattleman's, I'm told they knocked it down for some box store. For real?
SharonAnn
(13,772 posts)Is it cultural? Biological? Societal? Are young men more mentally unstable than young women? Do they choose different methods to express their instability?
Riddle me that.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)without trying to get their 15 minutes. Basically, it is a "hey look at me"
I noticed they don't fit the "mall ninja gun nut" stereotype either.
SharonAnn
(13,772 posts)a woman in their life doing something or taking a stand that triggered the event.
In the case of Newtown, it seems that perhaps the mother was planning to take legal guardianship of him so that he should commit him for treatment. Would he have had the same reaction if it had been his father who was doing this?
When I first heard about the shooting, I told a friend "I bet some woman did something and he got angry about it and decided to "show her something"". Not that it's her fault if it happens, it's would be the man's reaction to this and they way he deals with his anger
These are just thoughts and questions. I don't have any answers, but I don't think we're asking all the types of questions that need to be asked.
Thanks for the perceptive response. Definitely food for thought.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)committed. I do fault her for not securing her guns better.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)I have the same question & want more research, more treatment, more options.
ileus
(15,396 posts)Is that the truth?
One must assume your partner is approving of ole Wayne's idea to register people who are mentally ill? Correct?
I love my Son and Daughter and I protect them with the best safety devices available, that includes my non select fire AR with 30rnd pmags.
Safety first, victim last....
Stay safe my friends.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)Reminds me of the days when I chose not to wear seatbelts because I felt safer without them...until I learned more.
Folks who keep firearms in their homes increase the odds that they or their family will die by gunfire, either homicide or suicide.
That's the fact. They may feel safer, but they've actually increased the odds of an Adam Lanza ending, much like Lanza's mother.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)almost once in a lifetime, Dr. Kellermann's debunked non peer reviewed nonsense aside.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)...Adam Lanza was a troubled individual the presence of whom should, in my best estimation, have excluded keeping firearms unsecured in general and specifically unsecured from him. Regardless of personal feelings and anyone's relationships the remote chances of such events make it unwise for all but the most inflexible safety and security minded individuals to keep firearms. It is always a great temptation to unduly trust and/or enable a loved one.
Having said that, without the risk factors of drug use, mental health issues or criminal involvement, nothing about keeping a properly secured firearm will increase your personal chances of dying by homicide or suicide. If you have in mind a specific scenario, statistic or study, please do share it.
Welcome and Happy New Year
duhneece
(4,112 posts)PROBLEM: Keeping a gun in the home increases the risk of injury and death. Gun owners may overestimate the benefits of keeping a gun in the home and underestimate the risks.
DID YOU KNOW? Where there are more guns, there are more gun deaths.
Gun death rates are 7 times higher in the states with the highest compared with the lowest household gun ownership. (Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard Injury Control Research Center, 2009).
An estimated 41% of gun-related homicides and 94% of gun-related suicides would not occur under the same circumstances had no guns been present (Wiebe, p. 780).
Household gun ownership levels vary greatly by state, from 60 percent in Wyoming to 9 percent in Hawaii (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2001).
DID YOU KNOW? Keeping a gun in the home raises the risk of homicide.
States with the highest levels of gun ownership have 114 percent higher firearm homicide rates and 60 percent higher homicide rates than states with the lowest gun ownership (Miller, Hemenway, and Azrael, 2007, pp. 659, 660).
The risk of homicide is three times higher in homes with firearms (Kellermann, 1993, p. 1084).
Higher gun ownership puts both men and women at a higher risk for homicide, particularly gun homicide (Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard Injury Control Research Center, 2009).
DID YOU KNOW? Keeping a gun in the home raises the risk of suicide.
Keeping a firearm in the home increases the risk of suicide by a factor of 3 to 5 and increases the risk of suicide with a firearm by a factor of 17 (Kellermann, p. 467, p. Wiebe, p. 771).
The association between firearm ownership and increased risk of suicide cannot be explained by a higher risk of psychiatric disorders in homes with guns (Miller, p. 183).
DID YOU KNOW? A gun in the home is more likely to be used in a homicide, suicide, or unintentional shooting than to be used in self-defense.
Every time a gun injures or kills in self-defense, it is used:
11 times for completed and attempted suicides (Kellermann, 1998, p. 263).
7 times in criminal assaults and homicides, and
4 times in unintentional shooting deaths or injuries.
http://www.bradycampaign.org/facts/gunviolence/gunsinthehome
We obviously need more awareness, more education.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)"If youve got to resist, youre chances of being hurt are less the more lethal your weapon. If that were my wife, would I want her to have a .38 Special in her hand? Yeah." (Health Magazine, March/April 1994)
The fundamental failing of the studies you mention is restricting the study to those who've been shot.
Dr. Kellerman is, in the above quote, agreeing with statements from the FBI about crime victims.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)all of those studies were funded by the same foundation that astro turfs the Brady Campaign? Kellerman's studies are not peer reviewed and has been debunked? The Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard Injury Control Research Center exists mostly from grants from said foundation?
In other words, the Brady Campaign is hardly the conveyor of truth anymore than the NRA is.
kenichol
(252 posts)I find nothing that refutes the facts in their studies.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)11 times for completed and attempted suicides (Kellermann, 1998, p. 263).
7 times in criminal assaults and homicides, and
4 times in unintentional shooting deaths or injuries.
On the Brady page these statistics link to: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9715182
Which reports in part:
METHODS:
We reviewed the police, medical examiner, emergency medical service, emergency department, and hospital records of all fatal and nonfatal shootings in three U.S. cities: Memphis, Tennessee; Seattle, Washington; and Galveston, Texas.
RESULTS:
During the study interval (12 months in Memphis, 18 months in Seattle, and Galveston) 626 shootings occurred in or around a residence. This total included 54 unintentional shootings, 118 attempted or completed suicides, and 438 assaults/homicides. Thirteen shootings were legally justifiable or an act of self-defense, including three that involved law enforcement officers acting in the line of duty. For every time a gun in the home was used in a self-defense or legally justifiable shooting, there were four unintentional shootings, seven criminal assaults or homicides, and 11 attempted or completed suicides.
Excluded from any representation in the data used here are any defensive uses of a firearm where a death or injury did not occur. The excluded scenarios are:
1) The imminent use of deadly cause the assailant to discontinue the attack and retreat.
2) The victim fires but doesn't injure or kill anyone and the assailant discontinued the attack and retreated.
I strongly suspect that MOST folks view the idea of shooting someone as an extreme measure. The gun owners I know would not shoot someone who was retreating. The data and conclusions shown are technically correct but fail to represent the complete picture.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)Criminology is a well established field. It is well known in that field that it is extremely rare for a person to commit murder as a first vioent offense. Law-abiding people, with clean police records, almost never explode in violent temper rages. But people with criminal histories do exactly that. What those studies find is what everybody with common sense already knows, that it is dangerous to be a violent criminal or to live with one. It is illegal for them to have guns, but being criminals they will have them anyway.
It is a dishonest use of statistics to attempt to predict what will happen with a law-abiding person based on what violent criminals do.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)I see them as indicating that more guns equal more gun deaths, by suicide or homicide.
More guns in the home equals more deaths by guns of family and loved ones. That's what I see from looking as them.
Ashgrey77
(236 posts)I've been around guns my entire life and have NEVER been shot or threatened by any of the firearms that are stored safely in my own home. What you just said is a opinion, not a fact, and a poorly researched opinion at that.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)guns are definitely the problem.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)Unjust drug laws, the lack of mental health facilities are a piece of the problem, too.
iiibbb
(1,448 posts)for all of the logical fallacies flung around this debate.
http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/rhetological-fallacies/
Gun owners are insecure.... gun grabbers are insecure about functional adults having access to guns.
Ken wrote as dumb a letter as any position voiced by the NRA. Congratulations.
kenichol
(252 posts)As the author of the letter to the editor, posted by my partner, duhneece, I should clarify my intent. I do not blame guns, nor do I refer to people who really need protection, the hunters, or the target shooters (of which I am one).
I do blame just about everything else surrounding the gun culture, including the glorification of gun violence by TV, film, and games which has an influence on the weak minded, the ignored, the outcast, the easily influenced, the insecure, the frustrated, the bullied and the mentally confused. The American culture of the rugged individual, the emphasis on competition instead of cooperation, our worship of 'cowboy culture', our militaristic 'might makes right' mentality and community, all play a role in violence. The gun is used as a tool to act out cultural fantasies by the less grounded citizen.
The NRA, is just the pr stooge for the arms industry and thus part of the problem .
iiibbb
(1,448 posts)If this issue is about coming together in order to reach a solution to these issues... what drives people to make it personal? Do you think it accomplishes anything. All I think it does is contribute to the polarization of the issue.
You're no better than a tea-partier IMHO.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)I don't understand your substitution.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)please explain "cowboy culture" and how it is a bad thing? If you look at the history, cowboys and such were very cooperative. Japan is a very competitive society. It is also a collectivist society where the individual is less important.
http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/cowboyculture.htm
Are you saying that the UK's militaristic tradition and "empire" makes them lead the OCED countries in assaults? Outside of a few urban centers, we are as safe as Europe. Using your "cowboy culture" and "individualism is bad" example, how does that explain Chicago, DC, NOLA? Or El Paso for that matter? Gangs are not individualistic. They are part of a community, and that community comes before the individual. As much as biker gangs like to pretend otherwise, they are very conformist and collectivist. I'm not saying collectivism leads to violent crimes either, just saying that it all sounds like pop anthropology to me.
kenichol
(252 posts)The cowboy culture, like the Lincoln County Wars, meant that the rancher with most guns 'won' water or grazing rights.
When women who weren't sex workers moved out West, they demanded schools, churches and a sheriff who didn't just work for the most wealthy and powerful, ending the cowboy culture.
Of course, there were good things, too, but the myth of cowboys shoot-em-up glory still exists in my neck of the woods.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)while range wars existed, they were rare. The Lincoln County war was about maintaining a dry good monopoly, not grazing and water rights. It was trust busting by other means.
None of the "regulators" were cowboys. They were contract killers and criminals, not that much different than their New York, Chicago, Boston counterparts of that era, without the benefit of Ned Buntline's PR, or the modern criminal gangs that inhabit urban areas. BTW, urban gangs existed then too.
I grew up in Wyoming. I lived in New Mexico. In fact, I met my wife in Alamogordo. I try to be a good student of history. I think I have a pretty good grasp what cowboy culture is and what isn't.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)I maintain that the cowboy myth I see & am most familiar with is 'might makes right' and 'if you're powerful enough, you are above the law'. You see it differently, but you didn't share how you do see it or else I missed it. The healthy, positive cowboy experience I admire is working outside on horses, working together for a shared goal, but I am surrounded by the less healthy myth.
Sorry that earlier I forgot to answer about the restaurant you mentioned or how cool it is that you are familiar with Alamogordo/Holloman AFB. Yes, the restaurant closed -I was not impressed with it because 100% of its appetizer menu was fried, but I have a close friend who just loved their chicken fried steak.
Ken lives south of town, right up next to the mountain; I live north of town, in the canyons. I feel very fortunate to live where I want to live; NM IS the land of enchantment for me & I hope you got to enjoy the beauty of this unique area, with mountains & White Sands so close.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)in Wyoming are the positive healthy ones. Those were actual values, not the myth. But then, I didn't have a couple of bases next to me. I suspect that could be part of it. Less cowboy and more military retiree. I get that in Tampa as well. Of course, there are some military retirees like me and some of the folks in the Veterans in the DU veteran group who are not so much.
How did the Alex Jones fans take the news about the Luftwaffe unit moving in?
jeepnstein
(2,631 posts)The poster is obviously hanging their emotional baggage on to a public policy problem. They want to make decisions based on their feelings, and if we don't validate their feelings by tossing aside our rights, then we are heartless monsters. You just can't really have a rational discussion with someone like that.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)duhneece
(4,112 posts)jeepnstein
(2,631 posts)That's a novel approach.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)and described how cowboys "...constructed incidents of phony violence for the benefit of gullible visitors..."
"One favorite gambit in railroad towns was the fake shoot-out...while the passengers gawked, the cowboys would fire off a volley of shots, then pick up the limp form if a volunteer "corpse" and carry him out the door and around a corner."
Another trick was to hoist a lynched dummy into the air and then shoot the "body" repeatedly.
Thus the rise of pulp fiction, thus the rise of Cody's "Wild West" shows.
Forbis contends "most...gunfights occurred not between cowboys but in the Western underworld, among the gamblers, toughs and professional criminals who walk the corridors of ANY SOCIETY." (emphasis mine)
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)in that you did not include any links to reputable sources to back up the information you provided in your letter to the editor?
duhneece
(4,112 posts)Brady Campaign provides many resources. I listed several in my previous link. Should I assume you missed that...I prefer not to assume anything.
http://www.bradycampaign.org/facts/
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)It's ok if you cannot answer it however. I was referring to information supporting the claims made in the OP. your post#20 did not address those issues.
Bay Boy
(1,689 posts)...he included this blatant lie: "The NRA stance that the Union will collapse unless even the mentally unstable have the right to own and carry any kind of firearm anywhere they want is unsustainable". Show me where the NRA has ever said that.
It also seems to me that the 'rule' of debates that the first person to use the word Nazi in a debate automatically loses should also include the first person who uses the word penis loses too.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)And as many others see it as well.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)I detest having to defend the NRA, but their actual stated policies bear no resemblance whatsoever to what your partner claimed.
Bay Boy
(1,689 posts)...whatever he 'feels' is reality.
Ashgrey77
(236 posts)DonP
(6,185 posts)You said it was in response to 4 or 5 pro 2nd amendment letters.
If so "many others" see it your way, where were all their letters?
It's funny how gun control supporters always tell us how "everyone thinks like they do" but they never seem to show up at the polls or get around to actually doing anything in the real world to support gun control.
No Brady memberships, no petitions to repeal concealed carry, nothing but online talk it seems.
billh58
(6,635 posts)are the first person to use the word "penis" in this discussion.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)duhneece
(4,112 posts)We have a small nonprofit, Peace and Justice of La Luz http://pajoll.org and provide books to our jails & half-way houses, provide felons' voting rights info, have a booth with resources about the failed war on drugs. That he dances so well that I've danced more in the past few years than I have in my life, that he loves garlic and weird food combos (is willing to help fix and eat ANYTHING I suggest) are individual blessings beyond any I had imagined.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)of the crimes committed by the felons you say you are assisting?
duhneece
(4,112 posts)Many of them were raped, assaulted, traumatized by our legal system. Do you think felons deserve no help with voting rights or access to books?
Why, what do you do to help?
blue burro
(10 posts)of owning guns. I think I will buy memberships for some other family members as well.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)Sounds more like he hit a nerve.
blue burro
(10 posts)give up a Constitutional right because of the malefactions of a infinitesimally small number of crazies
who have abused that right. I don't have much sympathy for pearl-clutching whiners who would gladly give up their rights for a little bit of imagined safety...they deserve neither.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)Thank you. Your comments reveal how successful Ken's letter was while you attack his letter without discussing or dialoguing in any way.
blue burro
(10 posts)But you're not unique in that way.
billh58
(6,635 posts)WHAT logic, but your pizza came before I could type it...
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)esp. since women constitute the fastest-growing demographic of gun-owners (did I mention old?). Some studies show that blacks who commit murder do so at a rate several times that of the general population. Do you think that these males are several times more insecure than the general pop.? If so, why is this? Do you have any insight as to how this intense insecurity can be dealt with?
duhneece
(4,112 posts)Slavery while being incarcerated, marginalized when released from prison if convicted of self-medicating with drugs. Since minorities and the poor are imprisoned at a higher rate than whites for the same crimes, I believe they are more insecure so any changes for the better would have to include a wide variety of options for education, job training, housing, substance abuse treatment, mental health treatment, just to name a few.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)duhneece
(4,112 posts)I said, "...any changes for the better would have to include a wide variety of options for education, job training, housing, substance abuse treatment, mental health treatment, just to name a few. "
I would add that we need more research, in general, on behavioral health problems & solutions.
blue burro
(10 posts)or a million other adjuncts to sociopathy. Did you think of that all by yourself?
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)While I completely support ending the so-called war on drugs and legalizing all of them, I refuse to call the use of them, "self medicating".
duhneece
(4,112 posts)Do you work with inmates?
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)They VOLUNTARILY took a mind altering drug because they wanted to get high. They were not treating an illness.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)Many addicts are treating their post-traumatic stress following rape, incest, assault, abuse (physical, mental, emotional, spiritual) because drugs work to relieve their pain, for awhile.
Veterans back from Iraq & Afghanistan are the newest 'group' of addicts and homeless we're dealing with here.
bluerum
(6,109 posts)Maybe a new constitutional amendment to strip them of all rights. Dangerous bastards.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)But what does work is a raising of awareness.
LAGC
(5,330 posts)Perhaps we need more sensitivity training for boys in elementary school.
I don't believe testosterone is the culprit here, but rather how society molds its image of what it means to be a man.
Ideally, I'd like to see more women take up the shooting sports and more men pursue other hobbies.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)More options for all of us. More treatment for unhealthy patterns or habits of any kind...I agree with you that how society molds its image of what it means to be a man is HUGE in this discussion. So then, how do we organize to include more folks at the table in this discussion?
Locrian
(4,522 posts)Finally things are getting around to actually discussion of root cause: fear / insecurity / etc.
And it's not just guns. Our whole "market" is based on fear and fear based buying of things. Not to mention insecurity of social safety nets, community etc.
It goes deep - the culture we get is what we make for ourselves. Whether it's glorification of guns on tv, movies, games etc or manufactures or the NRA it creates the climate. I think it's less the violence in the movies/tv than it is the fantasy of people (men AND women) who want to pretend they're the hero. And the hero nowadays ALWAYS has the 'coolest' guns.
I still think it's rare (well, rare considering...) that people actually cross the line and commit such extreme actions. But cooking everything in this culture will get the outliers. And that's not counting the 'accidents' or the 'careless' shootings, etc
We're becoming like fearful big dogs. And a fearful dog is worse and more likely to bit than a confident one. That's one of the reasons I tend to discount the 'testosterone thing' (unless it's steriods etc).
loknar
(33 posts)I had a post shot down for suggesting that there were jobs to be found. I can't believe this insulting tripe stands.
billh58
(6,635 posts)bites the dust...
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)Male violence is part of all cultures and all times. It isn't unique to modern America.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)Been years since I read that book.
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1253902.African_Genesis?auto_login_attempted=true
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)Dale Peterson (Author), Richard Wrangham (Author)
Published in 1999
duhneece
(4,112 posts)Among developed nations. I include Mexico as America.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)as Estonia, both top us in murders
Out of just the OCED countries
UK has the most assaults
Australia has the most rapes
Belgium has the most robberies
duhneece
(4,112 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)Which I'm sure Mexicans and Canadians appreciate it (not) when Europeans and US conservatives call the US "America".
duhneece
(4,112 posts)I find it amazing that so I know speak of Americans as though the term excludes Mexicans, since we live 100 miles north of the Mexican border.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)the number of Anglo civilians that would bitch about "welfare queens", but freeloaded off the Mexican taxpayer. IIRC, Mexico has a single payer system with a small co pay. US civilians would go across the river because the care was more affordable, but didn't stop to ponder why it was affordable.
hack89
(39,171 posts)once they get back from breaking in my daughter's new AR-15
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)... and I assure you, she is neither insecure nor male.
duhneece
(4,112 posts)I value creativity and am proud when my family creates, serves, improves their professional skills...so I'm proud when my daughter, who is in law enforcement, improves her shooting because it helps her professionally and could save lives.
But it is sad when folks are proud when destruction (of paper targets, cans, clay pigeons) is the whole point of their time spent. Just seems creepily sad.