Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
Wed Jun 10, 2015, 05:46 AM Jun 2015

Carter: Steady funding needed for Europe reassurance

STUTTGART, Germany — The U.S. should continue to set aside special funds to maintain a beefed-up military presence in Europe, where more rotational forces, an expanded series of war games and increased fighter jet patrols have helped reassure allies rattled by Russian aggression in Ukraine, according to Defense Secretary Ash Carter.

Following a meeting Friday with military commanders and diplomats from across Europe at the U.S. European Command headquarters of Gen. Philip Breedlove in Stuttgart, Carter said it is clear the U.S. must find a way to ensure the so-called European Reassurance Initiative, begun last year, receives continuing support.

“We’re going to need to make that a part of our planning, programming, budgeting system going forward. There’s just no question about it,” Carter told reporters traveling with him, according to a transcript. “This is going to be an enduring challenge.”

The nearly $1 billion European Reassurance Initiative, approved by Congress in December, already has enabled the Pentagon to bolster its activities across the Continent, with a special focus on eastern Europe, where allies in close proximity to Russia and Ukraine are wary about Moscow’s intentions. However, the program, which is funded through overseas contingency funds, must be approved by Congress on an annual basis. While it remains unclear whether Congress will continue to support such funding, the ERI is shielded from the mandatory defense budget cap known as sequestration, which is imposed on the regular military budget. That could make it easier for the Pentagon to maintain funding support in the future should Congress fail to reach a deal that eliminates the mandated slowdown of spending in the base budget.

http://www.stripes.com/news/europe/carter-steady-funding-needed-for-europe-reassurance-1.351272

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Carter: Steady funding needed for Europe reassurance (Original Post) jakeXT Jun 2015 OP
Between our proxy wars and our propensity for weapons, unhappycamper Jun 2015 #1
I wonder who changed it to OIF /nt jakeXT Jun 2015 #2
IIRC the neocons changed it after folks noticed the O I L in the name. unhappycamper Jun 2015 #3
Looks like it took them a couple of days or weeks jakeXT Jun 2015 #4
Why should we spend dollars to protect an economy exboyfil Jun 2015 #5

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
1. Between our proxy wars and our propensity for weapons,
Wed Jun 10, 2015, 07:36 AM
Jun 2015

where are our congresscritters getting the money?

Iraq and Afghanistan cost AT LEAST one TRILLION dollars over the last 14 years. These 'adventures' were NOT paid for and ended up on our National Credit Card.

How many times must we train the same foreign forces? 2? 3?

Operation Iraqi Liberation was appropriately named.

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
3. IIRC the neocons changed it after folks noticed the O I L in the name.
Wed Jun 10, 2015, 07:44 AM
Jun 2015

It was too close to the reason we invaded.

exboyfil

(17,862 posts)
5. Why should we spend dollars to protect an economy
Wed Jun 10, 2015, 08:28 AM
Jun 2015

that is larger than ours from a foe that has probably 1/10th of its economy? Ditto for Korea and Japan.

We should have gotten out of NATO when the Soviet Union collapsed.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»Carter: Steady funding ne...