Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Over Where? Army Struggles To Relearn Rapid Deployment
http://breakingdefense.com/2016/03/over-where-army-struggles-to-relearn-rapid-deployment/A US Army M1 tank about to be shipped out in an ARC ship for Trident Juncture wargames.
Over Where? Army Struggles To Relearn Rapid Deployment
By Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. on March 16, 2016 at 3:52 PM
HUNTSVILLE, AL: This morning, Army Chief of Staff Mark Milley warned Congress that I have grave concerns about the Armys ability to respond to a major war say, with Russia, Gen. Milleys no. 1 threat in a timely manner. Here in Huntsville, generals and executives explained a big part of the reason why.
The environments changing and we have to be ready to go tonight, said Lt. Gen. Gustave Perna, the chief supply officer (G-4) on the Armys Pentagon staff. We need to assume that we will be contested wherever we go and that the enemy will not make the mistake of allowing us to go someplace close by and settle in and get ready.
Predictable rotations to Afghanistan and Iraq for 15 years have left the Army painfully out of practice for rapid deployment to unexpected crises. Now the service must relearn those skills even as budgets shrink, US-flagged shipping falls to historic lows, and adversaries like China and Russia invest in weapons to shoot us up as we come in.
Defense Secretary Ash Carter has directed Transportation Command to do a strategic portfolio review of strategic mobility in a contested environment, said the TRANSCOM deputy commander, Army Lt. Gen. Stephen Lyons. Currently, he said, all of our campaign analysis that we do (assumes) that were going to operate with impunity. Theres no attrition (from enemy action) built into any of that.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1138 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Over Where? Army Struggles To Relearn Rapid Deployment (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Mar 2016
OP
Well, I guess we'll just have to forgo any interventions for the forseeable future.
bemildred
Mar 2016
#2
arendt
(5,078 posts)1. You've done the trifecta today.
So, the Army didn't bother to spend on the "mundane" capability of transporting its fighting vehicles to the battlefield.
They spent it all on the war toys.
Perfect.
Looks like the corporate purchasing departments are in charge of our strategic policy.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)2. Well, I guess we'll just have to forgo any interventions for the forseeable future.
Pity, but it just wouldn't be right.