Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

zwyziec

(173 posts)
Fri May 6, 2016, 07:59 PM May 2016

Presidential Candidate Security Clearance

I've tried to find, unsuccessfully, what the requirement and schedule is, for a presidential candidate to go through a FBI investigation for a security clearance.

There are rules for their security nominees, for the Vice President picks, for other staff members.

It appears to me that after their respective nomination, they should undergo a thorough investigation.

Better to know one is elected if they are cleared to be privy to the CIA, FBI, Defense, etc. secrets.

Wonder if Trump could successfully navigate an investigation. Any connections to the mob? To foreign agencies?

Just say'n.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
3. It would be undemocratic and an offense to our Constitution to require the security
Fri May 6, 2016, 08:24 PM
May 2016

clearance of a future president.

I hope you aren't serious.

4. Once he's the official GOP nominee he'll get daily CIA briefings
Fri May 6, 2016, 08:34 PM
May 2016

How long do you think he'll be able to keep it to himself? His ego is so big he'll have to tell everyone what he knows just to show he knows it and they don't.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
6. According to one expert on Tweety tonight the briefing that Drumpf and
Fri May 6, 2016, 09:50 PM
May 2016

future VP candidate will receive (the same for Hillary and her VP) is usually only ONE, lasting a few hours. It does not cover operational issues, covert material or anything overly sensitive. It's more of a 'world view trip'. After that, no more briefings until a candidate is elected. Then the person elected as future President will receive all the same briefings Obama gets.

7. Whew!
Sat May 7, 2016, 12:33 PM
May 2016

I can imagine the briefing Bush got: "Europe is not a country; we don't have any treaties with Texas; ignore any briefing that contains the words 'Bin Laden,' 'determined,' 'strike' and 'United States.'"

 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
5. I know that once elected there is no higher authority on anyone's security, than the president
Fri May 6, 2016, 08:57 PM
May 2016

himself, and he is the final authority on what gets classified, he is the boss of that entire arena.

As far as before the election I don't know, but trying to block out, or make null and void one of the two major party candidates for the presidency, would be one hard thing to carry off.

When the people elect the boss of the military and of the entire executive branch, there is no bureaucrat sitting in a little office somewhere who can negate that election and decide for himself if the president qualifies.

I don't know if an outgoing president would have the power to hold briefings back from a major party nominee , if he does, it sure wouldn't go well for anyone, if it was tried.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
8. The people are the ultimate source of authority in the US government, and the President
Sun May 8, 2016, 05:38 AM
May 2016

is their agent. There is no higher authority to grant clearance to the President, except for his election by the people. That is his clearance, and all he needs in that regard.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»Presidential Candidate Se...