Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
DHS releases names of local jails that won't hold immigrants
Source: Associated Press
DHS releases names of local jails that won't hold immigrants
By ALICIA A. CALDWELL
Mar. 20, 2017 4:38 PM EDT
WASHINGTON (AP) The Trump administration is naming some names in its efforts to shame local jails that don't cooperate with immigration authorities. It's putting the spotlight on Travis County, Texas, home of liberal Austin.
The administration released a list of 206 cases of immigrants released from custody before federal agents could intervene. Roughly two-thirds were from Travis County.
The 206 figure is somewhat murky. It doesn't represent all the cases in which immigration authorities sought custody of people facing criminal charges, with major cities like New York and Los Angeles underrepresented on the list. It's also unclear what period it covers. The cases were identified by the administration between Jan. 28 and Feb. 3, but most of the detention requests had been made before then, as far back as early 2014. Also unclear is the status of the immigrants whether some are in federal or state custody.
The release of the list by Immigration and Customs Enforcement was prompted by an executive order signed by President Donald Trump in January. That order called on the government to document which local jurisdictions aren't cooperating with federal efforts to find and deport immigrants in the country illegally.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
By ALICIA A. CALDWELL
Mar. 20, 2017 4:38 PM EDT
WASHINGTON (AP) The Trump administration is naming some names in its efforts to shame local jails that don't cooperate with immigration authorities. It's putting the spotlight on Travis County, Texas, home of liberal Austin.
The administration released a list of 206 cases of immigrants released from custody before federal agents could intervene. Roughly two-thirds were from Travis County.
The 206 figure is somewhat murky. It doesn't represent all the cases in which immigration authorities sought custody of people facing criminal charges, with major cities like New York and Los Angeles underrepresented on the list. It's also unclear what period it covers. The cases were identified by the administration between Jan. 28 and Feb. 3, but most of the detention requests had been made before then, as far back as early 2014. Also unclear is the status of the immigrants whether some are in federal or state custody.
The release of the list by Immigration and Customs Enforcement was prompted by an executive order signed by President Donald Trump in January. That order called on the government to document which local jurisdictions aren't cooperating with federal efforts to find and deport immigrants in the country illegally.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/8e055c4392954c2fb5dc41c65fc55fea/dhs-releases-names-local-jails-wont-hold-immigrants
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1822 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DHS releases names of local jails that won't hold immigrants (Original Post)
Eugene
Mar 2017
OP
Warpy
(111,245 posts)1. Looks like AZ is the only border state that isn't telling them to go to hell
Every single county in NM has.
gopiscrap
(23,756 posts)2. excellent...I know my county in WA state isn't cooperating either
Warpy
(111,245 posts)3. Well, I knew Santa Fe and Albuquerque wouldn't
because both are sanctuary cities. I am just delighted that it's now state wide.
They're trying to get the buggers out of Superior Court but it's an uphill battle because our Tejana GOP governor is cooperating with them.