Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Veterans
Related: About this forumMore Bad News for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter?
http://nation.time.com/2012/12/11/more-bad-news-for-the-joint-strike-fighter/The F-35: the future of Air Force, Marine and Navy aviation
More Bad News for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter?
By Nick Schwellenbach
Dec. 11, 2012
Back in March, we broke the news that the Pentagons oversight office was taking a gander at the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program, estimated to cost potentially $1.5 trillion to develop, buy and operate over several decades (the Pentagon is so desperate to bring down the estimated cost to operate the plane theyre even hiring contractors to work on that problem!). The plane is the future of Air Force, Marine and Navy aviation, who plan to buy close to 2,500 of them: its the lone fighter in the pipeline.
The auditors report on F-35 quality assurance management (essentially how they identify and prevent problems) isnt out yet, but some of their findings were contained in a one-paragraph summary in a report to Congress that came out this week. Turns out they found some problems:
In February 2012, DoD IG initiated the F-35 AS9100 Quality Management System assessment to review conformity to specified quality management system(s), contractual quality clauses, and internal quality processes and procedures for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. As of September 2012, more than 190 findings were identified and four notices of concern sent to the F-35 Program Office. All findings were accepted and will be addressed and implemented to the maximum practicable extent.
While its not good news that problems were found, we dont know how serious they are. Whatever the case, its good that the Defense Department inspector general is taking a look at this mammoth and important program.
----
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/12/10/pol-cp-f-35-canada-industry-benefits.html
F-35's benefits to Canadian industry questioned
The Canadian Press
Posted: Dec 10, 2012 5:23 PM ET
Amid the avalanche of figures, statistics, estimates and soothing political assurances coming this week on the Conservative government's troubled stealth fighter program, one report will warn about the lagging benefit for Canada's aerospace sector.
And it could prove more damaging in the long run than the bruising debate about the eye-popping cost of the multi-role fighter, say some experts.
"What we're talking about here is pork," said Winslow Wheeler, a U.S. aviation expert and long-standing critic of the F-35.
"The government has been promising the world, but that's going to be very different than what's in hand."
----
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/technology/Tories+closely+tracked+coverage/7679187/story.html
Tories closely tracked F-35 coverage
By Lee Berthiaume, Postmedia News December 11, 2012 7:12 AM
Opposition parties pressed the Conservative government to come clean on the F-35 Monday even as internal documents emerged showing National Defence has been going all-out to track media coverage of the stealth fighter program.
This included categorizing news articles and blogs according to tone, following experts who were critical of the stealth fighter, and even looking for a contractor to track all mentions of the F-35 on social media sites such as Twitter.
The documents provide a glimpse into the extent to which public perception has figured into the government's handling of the jet program, whose future is in the air following reports auditing firm KPMG put the cost at more than $40 billion.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper remained tight-lipped in the House of Commons on Monday about his plans for the F-35 following reports last week that plans to sole-source the project had been killed as a result of the new cost estimate.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 2383 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
More Bad News for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter? (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Dec 2012
OP
msongs
(67,395 posts)1. the f 35 is designed to attack the US treasury nmt
Angleae
(4,482 posts)2. and it's doing a damn good job of it (about the only thing it's doing well)