Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Veterans
Related: About this forumHagel and Kerry Mean Obama Is Ready to Leave Afghanistan -- Finally
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jon-soltz/hagel-and-kerry-mean-obam_b_2440346.htmlHagel and Kerry Mean Obama Is Ready to Leave Afghanistan -- Finally
Jon Soltz
Posted: 01/09/2013 11:34 am
As the Obama adminstration prepares to meet with Hamid Karzai at the White House on Friday, something significant is happening at the White House regarding Afghanistan, and it is good for American security and our troops.
Not coincidentally, it has to do with two combat veterans, with five purple hearts between them. John Kerry as Secretary of State, and Chuck Hagel as Secretary of Defense mark the clearest intention to date that President Obama believes there is nothing more we can do in Afghanistan, it is time to bring our troops home (leaving only a counter-terror force in the region), and that it is time to definitively shut down the neocons.
In Hagel and Kerry, he is bringing aboard one man who opposed the surge in Afghanistan, and has long called for a drawdown, and another who quickly realized the surge was not a success, and called for a shift in strategy.
"I disagreed with the President Obama -- his decision to surge in Afghanistan -- as I did with President Bush on the surge in Iraq," Hagel told the Financial Times in 2011. "Of course, no force in the world can stand the sophisticated power of American military. Nobody can stay on the field with you, but that's not the issue. That never was the question. The question is then, 'What happens next? Where is this going? What is the end game? Is this going to lead to a unified nation? Is this going to lead to a national resolution of national governance, of freedom for individuals? Is that what we're buying here?' That's the question."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1619 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hagel and Kerry Mean Obama Is Ready to Leave Afghanistan -- Finally (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Jan 2013
OP
Of course Hagel voted in favor of the War in Iraq. Let us remember that 23 of his peers voted NO
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2013
#1
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)1. Of course Hagel voted in favor of the War in Iraq. Let us remember that 23 of his peers voted NO
Hagel along with his Republican cohort voted to invade Iraq because they thought there were WMDs. It was the single worst decision ever made in the Senate. 23 Senators made the right decision and voted no. 21 Democrats, 1 Republican of courage Lincoln Chaffee and 1 Independent.
Hagel voted Yes, Mr Bush Sir, please drop the bombs Sir.
It is sad that those who were wrong about Iraq were all rewarded and those who were right were forgotten.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)2. Except it wasn't a vote for war
Many voted for the resolution just to put pressure on Saddam Hussein, never dreaming that Bush would actually launch an unjustified invasion.