Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 02:38 AM Jan 2012

Gingrich pines for a more racist America

ORLANDO — By the time Newt Gingrich claimed victory in the South Carolina primary, I was in a crowded theater watching the movie about a kind of untold “American exceptionalism” that the Republican candidate seems to dismiss, if not disdain.

The newly released Red Tails tells the story of the black pilots of the 332nd Fighter Group, who before facing Hitler’s Luftwaffe had to overcome their countrymen’s implacable and groundless belief that they lacked the intelligence and courage to be fighter pilots during World War II. Overcoming an obstacle no white trainee faced, the pilots of the 332nd dealt the Luftwaffe a blow that once again underscored the vital contributions of blacks to America ’s greatness.

This is not what Gingrich “the historian” seems to have in mind when he speaks of “returning to the America we love.” If you listen to the former Georgia congressman’s campaign rhetoric, he makes subtle but unmistakable references to race, whether labeling the nation’s first black president a “food-stamp president” or insinuating that African Americans don’t have a work ethic. His solution? Let urban school children be in-house janitors. But of course.

Ahhh, the good ol’ days, when whites had job security and white picket fences and couldn’t be bossed around by uppity blacks, and African-Americans had to suffer gross indignities in order to put their lives on the line to defend their country. Gingrich doesn’t say this, but he doesn’t have to. A not-too-distant history, as seen in Red Tails, takes us back to that time. We don’t need Gingrich’s help.

Read more: http://www.mycentraljersey.com/article/20120128/NJOPINION03/301280006/Gingrich-pines-more-racist-America?odyssey=mod

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gingrich pines for a more racist America (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Jan 2012 OP
Yeah Gingrish is nothing but a bloviated ignoant gopiscrap Jan 2012 #1
Bill Clinton said it best. JohnnyRingo Jan 2012 #2
TRANSLATION: Gingrich Pines For A Racist American Majority rocktivity Jan 2012 #3
Returning to the "good old days" onpatrol98 Jan 2012 #4
For a looooong time on this very web site, that was a common theme Number23 Jan 2012 #5
I'm not surprised! onpatrol98 Jan 2012 #8
Don't go dissing the Mint Julip till you have had one at the Robin's Nest in DC Loudmxr Jan 2012 #6
Ah...yes... onpatrol98 Jan 2012 #7
of course he does. for one thing, he is NOTHING without white affirmative action. nofurylike Jan 2012 #9
That kind of two faced innuendo cbrer Feb 2012 #10

gopiscrap

(23,756 posts)
1. Yeah Gingrish is nothing but a bloviated ignoant
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 02:50 AM
Jan 2012

cracker...the true sorrow is that there is a portion of the country that takes this racist piece of shit seriously.

JohnnyRingo

(18,624 posts)
2. Bill Clinton said it best.
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 03:00 AM
Jan 2012

He explained that if a person believes the '60s was a positive era full of real social strides, that person will likely be a Democrat today.

If on the other hand, a person sees the '60s as a time that America began it's decline through unwarranted civil rights laws, unneeded women's liberation, and overgracious social safety nets, that person will likely be a Republican.

Gingrich is a classic picture of the latter.

rocktivity

(44,576 posts)
3. TRANSLATION: Gingrich Pines For A Racist American Majority
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 03:14 AM
Jan 2012

Because That's the Only Way He Could Possibly Win


rocktivity

onpatrol98

(1,989 posts)
4. Returning to the "good old days"
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 04:42 AM
Jan 2012

Yeah! I remember sitting in a graduate class with only one other black student, as the rest of the class lamented being born too late or how nice things used to be with sock hops, etc. Until one girl said, yeah...wouldn't it be great to go back to the 50's.

Before I knew it, I blurted out...Hell, no! You couldn't drag me back to the 50's. They seemed perplexed initially. How could anyone not want to go back? Then a few seemed offended. Good grief...leave it to the black kid to actually consider the bad things from the 50's while they were in the middle of a "let's go sip mint julip tea" dream.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
5. For a looooong time on this very web site, that was a common theme
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 06:41 AM
Jan 2012

Folks pining loud and proud for the 50s and 60s. How "great" everything was back then and how much "better" America was.

When a few folks mentioned that things were so much less than "great" and "wonderful" for black folks, women and a whole bunch of others, just like your grade school chums, a few got mighty offended. And accused the ones drawing their attention to the glaring inequalities during this "golden age" of America of "playing the race card."

Sigh.

Loudmxr

(1,405 posts)
6. Don't go dissing the Mint Julip till you have had one at the Robin's Nest in DC
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 07:53 AM
Jan 2012

Henry Clay brought the recipie in the 1840's and they have been making them ever since.

It takes about five minutes to make it and you can suck on that for a good half hour.

Wonderful.

onpatrol98

(1,989 posts)
7. Ah...yes...
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 08:09 AM
Jan 2012

Last edited Sun Jan 29, 2012, 01:29 PM - Edit history (1)

This would be the same Senator Clay who was sued by his slave, Charlotte Dupuy for her freedom and that of her two children, based on a promise by an earlier owner. She lost the lawsuit, because the good senator certainly couldn't be required to honor the promise of her previous "owner".

Then when she refused to return with Senator Mint Julip he had her arrested. But praise be to God, the good senator did eventually "free" her in 1840 along with one of her children. But, he decided to "keep" her son as his personal servant. Supposedly, citing the son frequently as just one example of how good he was to his slaves.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Clay

--------------------------------------------------------

But, hey! Thank God that Henry Clay found us a good recipe for Mint Julip.

nofurylike

(8,775 posts)
9. of course he does. for one thing, he is NOTHING without white affirmative action.
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 08:00 AM
Jan 2012

zero. dumb, delusional and arrogant/'entitled' beneficiary of unearned privilege.


thank you for this thread, Cali_Democrat!!

 

cbrer

(1,831 posts)
10. That kind of two faced innuendo
Fri Feb 3, 2012, 10:31 PM
Feb 2012

Boils my blood. It's very easy for me to lose it with a coward who is too lowly to have the courage of his own convictions.

Subtle, coded, mutually understood words. I broke in to a facebook chat recently, and busted out an idiot who used the term "ghetto commie" while referring to Prez Obama. He immediately got indignant, and said he had white people that he talked about the same way. Christ! Not only did this guy try to use the "some of my best friends are black" defense and actually expected me to buy it. But in his ignorance, he proved his greater than lead (PB) density. Pissed me off so badly I barely had the ability to point out his hypocrisy while calling Gingrich's marital infidelity OK and Clinton's wrong. Gingrich apologized you see, and didn't "do it" in the White house.

And even now I'm getting a little irate...

Long ago, someone told me "A dope is a dope, and a pretty girl is a pretty girl. Skin color has nothing to do with it."

Man! I'm glad we have such an exotic mixture of people. Makes life interesting!

Peace out

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»African American»Gingrich pines for a more...