The Nina Simone biopic, starring Zoe Saldana (with prosthetics)
It's hard to believe they couldn't find another good African American actor who wouldn't have needed dark makeup and prosthetics to more closely resemble Nina Simone.
http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2016/03/nina-simone-face/472107/
SNIP
We are being told that Nina Simone’s face bears no real import on the new eponymous movie about her life, starring Zoe Saldana. “The most important thing,” said Robert Johnson, whose studio is releasing Nina, “is that creativity or quality of performance should never be judged on the basis of color, or ethnicity, or physical likeness.” This is obviously false. Saldana could be the greatest thespian of her time, but no one would consider casting her as Marilyn Monroe. Indeed Nina’s producers have gone to great ends—tragicomic ends—to invoke Nina Simone’s face, darkening Saldana’s skin, adorning her with prosthetics. Neither the term blackface nor brownface is entirely appropriate here. We are not so much talking about deliberate mockery as something much more insidious.
It’s difficult to subtract the choice to cast Saldana from the economics of Hollywood—Saldana is seen as bankable in a way that other black women in her field are not. It’s equally difficult to ignore the fact that, while it is hard for all women in Hollywood, it is particularly hard for black women, and even harder for black women who share the dark skin, broad nose and full lips of Nina Simone. This fact is not separable from this country’s racist history, nor is the notion of “darkening up” a lighter skinned black person. Producers did it to Fredi Washington in Emperor Jones. They did it to Carmen de Lavallade in Lydia Bailey. (The make-up was called “Negro Number Two.”) They did it because they wanted to use the aura of blackness while evading the social realities of blackness. It’s possible that the producers were not, themselves, personally racist. This has no bearing whatsoever on anything. In America, racism is a default setting. To do nothing, to go along with the market, to claim innocence or neutrality, is to inevitably be a cog in the machine of racist hierarchy.
The producers of Nina are the heirs of this history—not personal racists, but cogs. Jezebel’s Kara Brown researched the team behind Nina. It is almost entirely white. Doubtless, these are good, non-racist people—but not good enough. No one on the team seems to understand the absurdity at hand—making a movie about Nina Simone while operating within the very same machinery that caused Simone so much agony in the first place. I do not mean to be personally harsh here. I am not trying to hurt people. But there is something deeply shameful—and hurtful—in the fact that even today a young Nina Simone would have a hard time being cast in her own biopic. In this sense, the creation of Nina is not a neutral act. It is part of the problem.
SNIP
= new reply since forum marked as read
The link at this link:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/118744605
Good piece! Thanks for posting!
Here's actress Marion Cotillard as Piaf
And here she is without makeup and prosthetics
And I'm a very big fan of Ms. Piaf's music. However - her life experience was not formed by her race or colorism.
Can you explain the similarity to me?
Is it just because they had to age her from young to old?
Putting a woman who has denied her 'blackness' in black face when there are plenty of black actresses (Emmy and Oscar winners) where they could have at least not had to put shoe polish on them is not the same as aging someone from young to old.
Or in the case of Bradd Pitt -Old and short to Tall and Young - then elderly infant.
