Sports
Related: About this forumGroup of former Penn State players call Freeh report 'highly flawed'
Franco Harris and two other former Penn State football players say the report about Penn State's handling of the Jerry Sandusky sex abuse scandal "is highly flawed, and factually insufficient."
Harris, Rudy Glocker and Christian Marrone sent to other Penn State alumni an email and letter criticizing the Freeh report that they plan publish in The Wall Street Journal and other large publications.
The players claim there was a rush to judgment by the media, the board of trustees, university officials and the NCAA after the blistering report was released two weeks ago.
The report compiled by a team led by former FBI director Louis Freeh accuses school officials, including late coach Joe Paterno, of covering up the abuse to avoid bad publicity.
"A grave injustice has occurred over these past two weeks that began with the issuance of the Freeh report," the email states. "After much review, it's clear the report is highly flawed, and factually insufficient. Yet, the media, the Board of Trustees, University officials and the NCAA, seem to have read only the conclusions and not the content of the report and have failed to question the report's evidentiary basis or lack thereof - they have rushed to judgment. As a result, OUR program has been brutally harmed and our Coach has been completely tarnished."
Read more: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/football/ncaa/07/28/penn-state-freeh-report-franco-harris.ap/index.html#ixzz21w4sljxQ
Iggo
(47,545 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Metalflake
(4 posts)Every time one of these apologists defend Paterno the NCAA should dock PSU another scholly until they get the message. It is very clear they haven't yet.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Is this story is about people attacking a report that was organized by Penn State. In fact, that is also what makes the sanctions interesting. The NCAA penalized Penn State based on information and resources provided by Penn State.
madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)the report was done without any subpoena power, so one really does not know what was said and by whom. Yeah, I know I am twisting the legalistic meanings of this, but did anyone actually testify under oath for this report? And the answer to that is no. I'm sure Freeh did a wonderful job, even though he has been demonized for most of the eight years I have been on DU.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)I look at any of these types as enablers.
It happened...it was done by Coach Perv...it was covered up...and allowed to continue.
Total sicko.
Response to madinmaryland (Original post)
radicalliberal This message was self-deleted by its author.