Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sports

JonLP24

(29,322 posts) Sat Jul 12, 2014, 06:56 PM Jul 2014

Pau Gasol to Chicago

http://espn.go.com/chicago/nba/story/_/id/11207844/pau-gasol-tweets-joining-chicago-bulls

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Pau Gasol to Chicago (Original Post) JonLP24 Jul 2014 OP

Not Good For the Lakers erpowers Jul 2014 #1

So is Kobe now headed to Cleveland?? madinmaryland Jul 2014 #2

Am I recalling correctly? Didnt he have a prickly relationship with Kobe? joeybee12 Jul 2014 #3

Bye Bye Carlos! ProfessorGAC Jul 2014 #4

erpowers

(9,350 posts)

1. Not Good For the Lakers

Reply to JonLP24 (Original post)

Sat Jul 12, 2014, 07:37 PM

Jul 2014

I would think that is not good for the lakers.

madinmaryland

(64,931 posts)

2. So is Kobe now headed to Cleveland??

Reply to JonLP24 (Original post)

Sat Jul 12, 2014, 07:47 PM

Jul 2014

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)

3. Am I recalling correctly? Didnt he have a prickly relationship with Kobe?

Reply to JonLP24 (Original post)

Sun Jul 13, 2014, 03:56 PM

Jul 2014

Seems like they all did.

ProfessorGAC

(64,854 posts)

4. Bye Bye Carlos!

Reply to JonLP24 (Original post)

Mon Jul 14, 2014, 11:05 AM

Jul 2014

Gasol might not stay as healthy as Boozer has the last couple years, but for Carlos' first year here, he couldn't stay on the court either.

At least Gasol has a drawer full of post moves, is a better rebounder and better help defender. He doesn't need to be great playing dual post with Noah out there.

Step up for the Bulls, Not earthshaking, or scene changing, but an upgrade and they'll be better as long as Rose comes back looking like he did before the knees.

Reply to this discussion